In this review, we discuss the evidence for patients returning to sport after hip arthroplasty. This includes the choices regarding level of sporting activity and revision or complications, the type of implant, fixation and techniques of implantation, and how these choices relate to health economics. It is apparent that despite its success over six decades, hip arthroplasty has now evolved to accommodate and support ever-increasing patient demands and may therefore face new challenges. Cite this article:
Aims. To demonstrate, with concrete examples, the value of in-depth
exploration and comparison of data published in National Joint Arthroplasty
registry reports. Patients and Methods. The author reviewed published current reports of National Joint
Arthroplasty registries for findings of current significance to
current orthopaedic practice. Results. A total of six observations that demonstrate actionable or unexpected
findings from joint registries are described. These include: one
third to one half of all arthroplasty failures in the first decade
occur in the first one to two years; infection rates after arthroplasty
have not declined in the last three decades; infection after TKA
is more common in men than women; outcomes of TKA are more variable
in young compared with older patients; new technologies (uncemented
implants and crosslinked polyethylene) have improved results of
THA and a real-time shift in use of
Joint replacement of the hip and knee remain
very satisfactory operations. They are, however, expensive. The
actual manufacturing of the implant represents only 30% of the final
cost, while sales and marketing represent 40%. Recently, the patents
on many well established and successful implants have expired. Companies
have started producing and distributing implants that purport to
replicate existing implants with good long-term results. The aims of this paper are to assess the legality, the monitoring
and cost saving implications of such generic implants. We also assess
how this might affect the traditional orthopaedic implant companies. Cite this article:
The continual cycle of bone formation and resorption
is carried out by osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts under
the direction of the bone-signaling pathway. In certain situations
the host cycle of bone repair is insufficient and requires the assistance
of bone grafts and their substitutes. The fundamental properties
of a bone graft are osteoconduction, osteoinduction, osteogenesis,
and structural support. Options for bone grafting include autogenous
and allograft bone and the various isolated or combined substitutes
of calcium sulphate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and
coralline hydroxyapatite. Not all bone grafts will have the same
properties. As a result, understanding the requirements of the clinical
situation and specific properties of the various types of bone grafts
is necessary to identify the ideal graft. We present a review of
the bone repair process and properties of bone grafts and their
substitutes to help guide the clinician in the decision making process. Cite this article:
