Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected.Aims
Methods
The responsiveness of the Manchester–Oxford Foot
Questionnaire (MOXFQ) was compared with foot/ankle-specific and
generic outcome measures used to assess all surgery of the foot
and ankle. We recruited 671 consecutive adult patients awaiting
foot or ankle surgery, of whom 427 (63.6%) were female, with a mean
age of 52.8 years (18 to 89). They independently completed the MOXFQ,
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaires pre-operatively
and at a mean of nine months (3.8 to 14.4) post-operatively. Foot/ankle
surgeons assessed American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
scores corresponding to four foot/ankle regions. A transition item measured
perceived changes in foot/ankle problems post-surgery. Of 628 eligible
patients proceeding to surgery, 491 (78%) completed questionnaires
and 262 (42%) received clinical assessments both pre- and post-operatively. The
regions receiving surgery were: multiple/whole foot in eight (1.3%),
ankle/hindfoot in 292 (46.5%), mid-foot in 21 (3.3%), hallux in
196 (31.2%), and lesser toes in 111 (17.7%). Foot/ankle-specific
MOXFQ, AOFAS and EQ-5D domains produced larger effect sizes (>
0.8)
than any SF-36 domains, suggesting superior responsiveness. In analyses
that anchored change in scores and effect sizes to patients’ responses
to a transition item about their foot/ankle problems, the MOXFQ
performed well. The SF-36 and EQ-5D performed poorly. Similar analyses,
conducted within foot-region based sub-groups of patients, found
that the responsiveness of the MOXFQ was good compared with the
AOFAS. This evidence supports the MOXFQ’s suitability for assessing
all foot and ankle surgery.
