Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system. Surgical management is fraught with challenges due to high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to describe surgical treatment and evaluate surgical outcomes of TGCT at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours and to identify factors affecting recurrence rates. A prospective database of all patients with TGCT surgically managed by two orthopaedic oncology surgeons was reviewed. All cases irrespective of previous treatment were included and patients without follow-up were excluded. Pertinent tumour characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected for analysis.Aims
Methods
The consensus is that bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) in allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) reconstruction of the proximal femur following primary tumour resection provides more stability than total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no comparative study has been performed. In this study, we have compared the outcome and complication rates of these two methods. In a retrospective study, 57 patients who underwent APC reconstruction of proximal femur following the primary tumour resection, either using BHA (29) or THA (28), were included. Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Postoperative complications of the two techniques were also compared.Aims
Methods
The aim of the study was to compare measures of the quality of
life (QOL) after resection of a chordoma of the mobile spine with
the national averages in the United States and to assess which factors
influenced the QOL, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and coping
with pain post-operatively in these patients. A total of 48 consecutive patients who underwent resection of
a primary or recurrent chordoma of the mobile spine between 2000
and 2015 were included. A total of 34 patients completed a survey
at least 12 months post-operatively. The primary outcome was the
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were
the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
anxiety, depression and pain interference questionnaires. Data which
were recorded included the indication for surgery, the region of
the tumour, the number of levels resected, the status of the surgical
margins, re-operations, complications, neurological deficit, length
of stay in hospital and rate of re-admission.Aims
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with
a diffuse-type giant-cell tumour (Dt-GCT) (previously known as pigmented
villonodular synovitis) around the knee in order to assess the influence
of the type of surgery on the functional outcome and quality of
life (QOL). Between 1980 and 2001, 15 of these tumours had been
treated primarily at our tertiary referral centre and 15 had been
referred from elsewhere with recurrent lesions. The mean follow-up was 64 months (24 to 393). Functional outcome
and QOL were assessed with range of movement and the Knee injury
and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Musculoskeletal Tumour
Society (MSTS) score, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS)
and the SF-36 questionnaire. There was recurrence in four of 14
patients treated initially by open synovectomy. Local control was
achieved after a second operation in 13 of 14 (93%). Recurrence
occurred in 15 of 16 patients treated initially by arthroscopic
synovectomy. These patients underwent a mean of 1.8 arthroscopies
(one to eight) before open synovectomy. This achieved local control
in 8 of 15 (53%) after the first synovectomy and in 12 of 15 (80%)
after two. The functional outcome and QOL of patients who had undergone
primary arthroscopic synovectomy and its attendant subsequent surgical
procedures were compared with those who had had a primary open synovectomy
using the following measures: range of movement (114º Those who had undergone open synovectomy needed fewer subsequent
operations. Most patients who had been referred with a recurrence
had undergone an initial arthroscopic synovectomy followed by multiple
further synovectomies. At the final follow-up of eight years (2
to 32), these patients had impaired function and QOL compared with
those who had undergone open synovectomy initially. We conclude that the natural history of Dt-GCT in patients who
are treated by arthroscopic synovectomy has an unfavourable outcome,
and that primary open synovectomy should be undertaken to prevent
recurrence or residual disease. Cite this article:
Giant cell tumours (GCT) of the synovium and
tendon sheath can be classified into two forms: localised (giant
cell tumour of the tendon sheath, or nodular tenosynovitis) and
diffuse (diffuse-type giant cell tumour or pigmented villonodular
synovitis). The former principally affects the small joints. It
presents as a solitary slow-growing tumour with a characteristic
appearance on MRI and is treated by surgical excision. There is
a significant risk of multiple recurrences with aggressive diffuse
disease. A multidisciplinary approach with dedicated MRI, histological assessment
and planned surgery with either adjuvant radiotherapy or systemic
targeted therapy is required to improve outcomes in recurrent and
refractory diffuse-type GCT. Although arthroscopic synovectomy through several portals has
been advocated as an alternative to arthrotomy, there is a significant
risk of inadequate excision and recurrence, particularly in the
posterior compartment of the knee. For local disease partial arthroscopic
synovectomy may be sufficient, at the risk of recurrence. For both
local and diffuse intra-articular disease open surgery is advised
for recurrent disease. Marginal excision with focal disease will
suffice, not dissimilar to the treatment of GCT of tendon sheath.
For recurrent and extra-articular soft-tissue disease adjuvant therapy,
including intra-articular radioactive colloid or moderate-dose external
beam radiotherapy, should be considered.
We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.
Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for a primary bone tumour is a rarely attempted and technically challenging procedure. We report the outcome of six patients treated between 1981 and 2007. There were four males and two females, with a mean age of 43.5 years (15 to 75), and a mean follow-up of 9.6 years (1 to 27). No patient developed a local recurrence or metastasis. Two of the six went on to have a below-knee amputation for persistent infection after a mean 16 months (1 to 31). The four patients who retained their endoprosthesis had a mean musculoskeletal tumour society score of 70% and a mean Toronto extremity salvage score of 71%. All were pain free and able to perform most activities of daily living in comfort. A custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint is a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with a primary bone tumour. Patients should, however, be informed of the risk of infection and the potential need for amputation if this cannot be controlled.