Vancomycin and fosfomycin are antibiotics commonly used to treat methicillin-resistant Vancomycin-impregnated articulating cement spacers and fosfomycin-impregnated articulating cement spacers were immersed in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions and then incubated. Samples were collected for bioactivity evaluation. The aliquots were tested for MRSA inhibition with the disc diffusion method, and the inhibition zone diameters were measured. The inhibition zone differences were evaluated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test.Objectives
Methods
We describe the use of a protocol of irrigation and debridement
(I&
D) with retention of the implant for the treatment of periprosthetic
infection of a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This may be an attractive
alternative to staged re-implantation. Between 1990 and 2010, 23 consecutive patients were treated in
this way. Three were lost to follow-up leaving 20 patients (21 TEAs)
in the study. There were six men and 14 women. Their mean age was
58 years (23 to 76). The protocol involved: component unlinking,
irrigation and debridement (I&
D), and the introduction of antibiotic
laden cement beads; organism-specific intravenous antibiotics; repeat
I&
D and re-linkage of the implant if appropriate; long-term
oral antibiotic therapy. Aims
Patients and Methods
Metaphyseal bone loss is common with revision
total knee replacement (RTKR). Using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research
Institute (AORI) classification, type 2-B and type 3 defects usually
require large metal blocks, bulk structural allograft or highly
porous metal cones. Tibial and femoral trabecular metal metaphyseal
cones are a unique solution for large bone defects. These cones
substitute for bone loss, improve metaphyseal fixation, help correct
malalignment, restore the joint line and may permit use of a shorter
stem. The technique for insertion involves sculpturing of the remaining
bone with a high speed burr and rasp, followed by press-fit of the
cone into the metaphysis. The fixation and osteoconductive properties
of the porous cone outer surface allow ingrowth and encourage long-term
biological fixation. The revision knee component is then cemented
into the porous cone inner surface, which provides superior fixation
compared with cementing into native but deficient metaphyseal bone.
The advantages of the cone compared with allograft include: technical
ease, biological fixation, no resorption, and possibly a lower risk
of infection. The disadvantages include: difficult extraction and
relatively short-term follow-up. Several studies using cones report
promising short-term results for the reconstruction of large bone
defects in RTKR. Cite this article:
A soft-tissue defect over an infected total knee
replacement (TKR) presents a difficult technical problem that can
be treated with a gastrocnemius flap, which is rotated over the
defect during the first-stage of a revision procedure. This facilitates
wound healing and the safe introduction of a prosthesis at the second
stage. We describe the outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years
(1 to 10) in 24 patients with an infected TKR who underwent this procedure.
A total of 22 (92%) eventually obtained a satisfactory result. The
mean Knee Society score improved from 53 pre-operatively to 103
at the latest follow-up (p <
0.001). The mean Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and Short-Form 12
score also improved significantly (p <
0.001). This form of treatment can be used reliably and safely to treat
many of these complex cases where control of infection, retention
of the components and acceptable functional recovery are the primary
goals. Cite this article:
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
Persistent groin pain after seemingly successful
total hip replacement (THR) appears to have become more common.
Recent studies have indicated a high incidence after metal-on-polyethylene
and metal-on-metal conventional THR and it has been documented in
up to 18% of patients after metal-on-metal resurfacing. There are many
causes, including acetabular loosening, stress fracture, and iliopsoas
tendonitis and impingement. The evaluation of this problem requires
a careful history and examination, plain radiographs and an algorithmic approach
to special diagnostic imaging and tests. Non-operative treatment
is not usually successful. Specific operative treatment depending
on the cause of the pain usually involves revision of the acetabular
component, iliopsoas tenotomy or other procedures, and is usually
successful. Here, an appropriate algorithm is described.
We report the long-term results of the management
of neglected chronically infected total knee replacements with a
two-stage re-implantation protocol. In 18 of 34 patients (53%) a
resistant organism was isolated. All cases were treated by the same
surgical team in a specialist centre and had a mean follow-up of
12.1 years (10 to 14). They were evaluated clinically and radiologically
using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the American Knee Society Roentgenographic
scoring system, respectively. One patient died after eight years
from an unrelated cause and two were lost to follow-up. Three patients
(8.8%) developed a recurrent infection for which further surgery
was required. The infection was eradicated successfully in 31 patients
(91.1%). There was one case of aseptic loosening after 13 years.
We found a significant improvement in the KSS at final follow-up
(p <
0.001).
While frequently discussed as a standard treatment for the management of an infected shoulder replacement, there is little information on the outcome of