There is not adequate evidence to establish whether external
fixation (EF) of pelvic fractures leads to a reduced mortality.
We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank database to identify isolated
unstable pelvic ring fractures to exclude the possibility of blood
loss from other injuries, and analyzed the effectiveness of EF on
mortality in this group of patients. This was a registry-based comparison of 1163 patients who had
been treated for an isolated unstable pelvic ring fracture with
(386 patients) or without (777 patients) EF. An isolated pelvic
ring fracture was defined by an Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) for
other injuries of <
3. An unstable pelvic ring fracture was defined
as having an AIS ≥ 4. The primary outcome of this study was mortality.
A subgroup analysis was carried out for patients who required blood
transfusion within 24 hours of arrival in the Emergency Department
and those who had massive blood loss (AIS code: 852610.5). Propensity-score
matching was used to identify a cohort like the EF and non-EF groups.Aim
Patients and Methods
Exsanguination is the second most common cause
of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of
haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial,
as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons
on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation.
Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents
or halts the progression of the
We describe the impact of a targeted performance
improvement programme and the associated performance improvement
interventions, on mortality rates, error rates and process of care
for haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Clinical
care and performance improvement data for 185 adult patients with exsanguinating
pelvic trauma presenting to a United Kingdom Major Trauma Centre
between January 2007 and January 2011 were analysed with univariate
and multivariate regression and compared with National data. In
total 62 patients (34%) died from their injuries and opportunities
for improved care were identified in one third of deaths. Three major interventions were introduced during the study period
in response to the findings. These were a massive haemorrhage protocol,
a decision-making algorithm and employment of specialist pelvic
orthopaedic surgeons. Interventions which improved performance were
associated with an annual reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.64
(95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.93), p = 0.02), a reduction
in error rates (p = 0.024) and significant improvements in the targeted
processes of care. Exsanguinating patients with pelvic trauma are
complex to manage and are associated with high mortality rates;
implementation of a targeted performance improvement programme achieved
sustained improvements in mortality, error rates and trauma care
in this group of severely injured patients. Cite this article:
