Aims.
Eight-plates are used to correct varus-valgus deformity (VVD) or limb-length discrepancy (LLD) in children and adolescents. It was reported that these implants might create a bony deformity within the knee joint by change of the roof angle (RA) after epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia following a radiological assessment limited to anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The aim of this study was to analyze the RA, complemented with lateral knee radiographs, with focus on the tibial slope (TS) and the degree of deformity correction. A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted. The treatment group (n = 64 knees in 44 patients) was subclassified according to the implant location in two groups: 1) medial hemiepiphysiodesis; and 2) lateral hemiepiphysiodesis. A third control group consisted of 25 untreated knees. The limb axes and RA were measured on long standing AP leg radiographs. Lateral radiographs of 40 knees were available for TS analysis. The mean age of the patients was 10.6 years (4 to 15) in the treatment group and 8.4 years (4 to 14) in the control group. Implants were removed after a mean 1.2 years (0.5 to 3).Aims
Methods
Permanent growth arrest of the longer bone is
an option in the treatment of minor leg-length discrepancies. The
use of a tension band plating technique to produce a temporary epiphysiodesis
is appealing as it avoids the need for accurate timing of the procedure
in relation to remaining growth. We performed an animal study to
establish if control of growth in a long bone is possible with tension
band plating. Animals (pigs) were randomised to temporary epiphysiodesis
on either the right or left tibia. Implants were removed after ten
weeks. Both tibiae were examined using MRI at baseline, and after
ten and 15 weeks. The median interphyseal distance was significantly shorter
on the treated tibiae after both ten weeks (p = 0.04) and 15 weeks
(p = 0.04). On T. 1. -weighted images the metaphyseal water
content was significantly reduced after ten weeks on the treated
side (p = 0.04) but returned to values comparable with the untreated
side at 15 weeks (p = 0.14). Return of growth was observed in all
animals after removal of implants.