The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical
and radiological outcome of patients who suffer recurrent injuries
to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after reconstruction and
require revision surgery. From a consecutive series of 200 patients who underwent primary
reconstruction following rupture of the ACL, we identified 36 who
sustained a further rupture, 29 of whom underwent revision surgery.
Patients were reviewed prospectively at one, two, seven, 15 and
about 20 years after their original surgery. Primary outcome measures
were the number of further ruptures, the posterior tibial slope
(PTS), and functional and radiological outcomes. These were compared
with a gender and age matched cohort of patients who underwent primary
ACL reconstruction only.Aims
Patients and Methods
The term mid-flexion instability has entered
the orthopaedic literature as a concept, but has not been confirmed
as a distinct clinical entity. The term is used freely, sometimes
as a synonym for flexion instability. However, the terms need to
be clearly separated. A cadaver study published in 1990 associated
joint line elevation with decreased stability at many angles of
flexion, but that model was not typical of clinical scenarios. The
literature is considered and it is proposed that the more common
entity of an uncorrected flexion contracture after a measured resection arthroplasty
technique is more likely to produce clinical findings that suggest
instability mid-flexion. It is proposed that the clinical scenario encountered is generalised
instability, with the appearance of stability in full extension
from tight posterior structures. This paper seeks to clarify whether mid-flexion instability exists
as an entity distinct from other commonly recognised forms of instability. Cite this article:
Instability in flexion after total knee replacement
(TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension
gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to
instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically,
required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes.
Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision
for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components.
There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65
years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society
score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery.
The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar
offset (p <
0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p <
0.001)
and increased posterior tibial slope (p <
0.001) contributed
to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain
stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset
and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior
tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was
a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function
(both p <
0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient
underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of
tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar
offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps
do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps. Cite this article:
We retrospectively analysed the MR scans of 25 patients with patellofemoral dysplasia and ten control subjects, to assess whether there was any change in the morphology of the patella along its vertical length. Ratios were calculated comparing the size of the cartilaginous and subchondral osseous surfaces of the lateral and medial facets. We also classified the morphology using the scoring systems of Baumgartl and Wiberg. There were 18 females and seven males with a mean age of 20.2 years (10 to 29) with dysplasia and two females and eight males with a mean age of 20.4 years (10 to 29) in the control group. In the patient group there was a significant difference in morphology from proximal to distal for the cartilaginous (Analysis of variance (ANOVA) p = 0.004) and subchondral osseous surfaces (ANOVA, p = 0.002). In the control group there was no significant difference for either the cartilaginous (ANOVA, p = 0.391) or the subchondral osseous surface (ANOVA, p = 0.526). Our study has shown that in the dysplastic patellofemoral articulation the medial facet of the patella becomes smaller in relation to the lateral facet from proximal to distal. MRI is needed to define clearly the cartilaginous and osseous morphology of the patella before surgery is considered for patients with patellofemoral dysplasia.
