The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any significant
difference in temporal measurements of pain, function and rates
of re-tear for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients compared
with those patients undergoing open RCR. This study compared questionnaire- and clinical examination-based
outcomes over two years or longer for two series of patients who
met the inclusion criteria: 200 open RCR and 200 arthroscopic RCR
patients. All surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Objectives
Methods
A total of 92 patients with symptoms for over
six months due to subacromial impingement of the shoulder, who were
being treated with physiotherapy, were included in this study. While
continuing with physiotherapy they waited a further six months for
surgery. They were divided into three groups based on the following
four clinical and radiological criteria: temporary benefit following
steroid injection, pain in the mid-arc of abduction, a consistently positive
Hawkins test and radiological evidence of impingement. Group A fulfilled
all four criteria, group B three criteria and group C two criteria.
A total of nine patients improved while waiting for surgery and
were excluded, leaving 83 who underwent arthroscopic subacromial
decompression (SAD). The new Oxford shoulder score was recorded
pre-operatively and at three and 12 months post-operatively. A total of 51 patients (group A) had a significant improvement
in the mean shoulder score from 18 (13 to 22) pre-operatively to
38 (35 to 42) at three months (p <
0.001). The mean score in
this group was significantly better than in group B (21 patients)
and C (11 patients) at this time. At one year patients in all groups
showed improvement in scores, but patients in group A had a higher
mean score (p = 0.01). At one year patients in groups A and B did
better than those in group C (p = 0.01). Arthroscopic SAD is a beneficial intervention in selected patients.
The four criteria could help identify patients in whom it is likely
to be most effective.
This study was performed to review the safety and outcome of total shoulder replacements in patients who are ≥ 80 years of age. A total of 50 total shoulder replacements in 44 patients at a mean age of 82 years (80 to 89) were studied. Their health and shoulder status, the operation and post-operative course were analysed, including pain, movement, patient satisfaction, medical and
We report a randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic acromioplasty in the treatment of stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. A total of 140 patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: supervised exercise programme (n = 70, exercise group) and arthroscopic acromioplasty followed by a similar exercise programme (n = 70, combined treatment group). The main outcome measure was self-reported pain on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 at 24 months, measured on the 134 patients (66 in the exercise group and 68 in the combined treatment group) for whom endpoint data were available. An intention-to-treat analysis disclosed an improvement in both groups but without statistically significant difference in outcome between the groups (p = 0.65). The combined treatment was considerably more costly. Arthroscopic acromioplasty provides no clinically important effects over a structured and supervised exercise programme alone in terms of subjective outcome or cost-effectiveness when measured at 24 months. Structured exercise treatment should be the basis for treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome, with operative treatment offered judiciously until its true merit is proven.
We describe the results of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty using the mark III prosthesis in patients over 80 years of age. End-stage arthritis of the shoulder is a source of significant pain and debilitating functional loss in the elderly. An arthroplasty offers good relief of pain and may allow the patient to maintain independence. The risk-benefit ratio of shoulder replacement may be felt to be too high in an elderly age group, but there is no published evidence to support this theory. We have assessed whether the procedure was as reliable and safe as previously seen in a younger cohort of patients. Between 1993 and 2003, 213 Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty procedures were performed in our unit, of which 29 (13.6%) were undertaken in patients over the age of 80. This group of patients was followed up for a mean of 4.5 years (2.1 to 9.3). Their mean age was 84.3 years (81 to 93), the mean operating time was 40 minutes (30 to 45) and the mean in-patient stay was five days (2 to 21). There were no peri-operative deaths or significant complications. The mean Constant score adjusted for age and gender, improved from 15.1% to 77%. Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty may be performed with minimal morbidity and rapid rehabilitation in the elderly.