Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the small bones
of the hands and feet are rare. Small case series have been published but
there is no consensus about ideal treatment. We performed a systematic
review, initially screening 775 titles, and included 12 papers comprising
91 patients with GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet. The
rate of recurrence across these publications was found to be 72%
(18 of 25) in those treated with isolated curettage, 13% (2 of 15)
in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants, 15% (6 of 41) in
those treated by resection and 10% (1 of 10) in those treated by
amputation. We then retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated for GCT
of the small bones of the hands and feet between 1987 and 2010 in
five specialised centres. The primary treatment was curettage in
six, curettage with adjuvants (phenol or liquid nitrogen with or
without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) in 18 and resection in six.
We evaluated the rate of complications and recurrence as well as
the factors that influenced their functional outcome. At a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (2 to 26) the rate of recurrence
was 50% (n = 3) in those patients treated with isolated curettage,
22% (n = 4) in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants and 17%
(n = 1) in those treated with resection (p = 0.404). The only complication
was pain in one patient, which resolved after surgical removal of remnants
of PMMA. We could not identify any individual factors associated
with a higher rate of complications or recurrence. The mean post-operative
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were slightly higher after
intra-lesional treatment including isolated curettage and curettage
plus adjuvants (29 (20 to 30)) compared with resection (25 (15 to
30)) (p = 0.091). Repeated curettage with adjuvants eventually resulted
in the cure for all patients and is therefore a reasonable treatment
for both primary and recurrent GCT of the small bones of the hands
and feet. Cite this article:
Several techniques have been described to reconstruct a mobile wrist joint after resection of the distal radius for tumour. We reviewed our experience of using an osteo-articular allograft to do this in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.9 months (28 to 119). The mean range of movement at the wrist was 56° flexion, 58° extension, 84° supination and 80° pronation. The mean ISOLS-MSTS score was 86% (63% to 97%) and the mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 16.5 (3 to 34). There was no local recurrence or distant metastases. The procedure failed in one patient with a fracture of the graft and an arthrodesis was finally required. Union was achieved at the host-graft interface in all except two cases. No patient reported more than modest non-disabling pain and six reported no pain at all. Radiographs showed early degenerative changes at the radiocarpal joint in every patient. A functional pain-free wrist can be restored with an osteo-articular allograft after resection of the distal radius for bone tumour, thereby avoiding the donor site morbidity associated with an autograft. These results may deteriorate with time.
Between June 2005 and March 2008, 14 patients with a Campanacci grade-3 giant-cell tumour of the distal radius were treated by en bloc resection and reconstruction by ulnar translocation with arthrodesis of the wrist. The mean length of radius resected was 7.9 cm (5.5 to 15). All the patients were followed to bony union and 12 were available at a mean follow-up of 26 months (10 to 49). The mean time to union was four months (3 to 7) at the ulnocarpal junction and five months (3 to 8) at the ulnoradial junction. All except one patient had an excellent range of pronation and supination. The remaining patient developed a radio-ulnar synostosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 26 (87%, range 20 to 28). Three patients had a soft-tissue recurrence, but with no bony involvement. They underwent a further excision and are currently well and free from disease. Ulnar translocation provides a local vascularised bone graft to reconstruct the defect left after excision of the distal radius for giant cell tumour. It avoids the need for a microvascular procedure while retaining rotation of the forearm and good function of the hand.
We describe a case of osteosarcoma of the
