This animal study compares different methods
of performing an osteotomy, including using an Erbium-doped Yttrium
Aluminum Garnet laser, histologically, radiologically and biomechanically.
A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups
(Group I: multihole-drilling; Group II: Gigli saw; Group III: electrical
saw blade and Group IV: laser). A proximal transverse diaphyseal
osteotomy was performed on the right tibias of the rabbits after the
application of a circular external fixator. The rabbits were killed
six weeks after the procedure, the operated tibias were resected
and radiographs taken. The specimens were tested biomechanically using three-point bending
forces, and four tibias from each group were examined histologically.
Outcome parameters were the biomechanical stability of the tibias
as assessed by the failure to load and radiographic and histological
examination of the osteotomy site. The osteotomies healed in all specimens both radiographically
and histologically. The differences in the mean radiographic (p
= 0.568) and histological (p = 0.71) scores, and in the mean failure
loads (p = 0.180) were not statistically significant between the
groups. Different methods of performing an osteotomy give similar quality
of union. The laser osteotomy, which is not widely used in orthopaedics
is an alternative to the current methods. Cite this article:
