The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is a pivotal
articulation in the linked system of the upper limb girdle, providing
load-bearing in compression while resisting displacement in tension
or distraction at the manubrium sterni. The SCJ and acromioclavicular
joint (ACJ) both have a small surface area of contact protected
by an intra-articular fibrocartilaginous disc and are supported
by strong extrinsic and intrinsic capsular ligaments. The function
of load-sharing in the upper limb by bulky periscapular and thoracobrachial
muscles is extremely important to the longevity of both joints.
Ligamentous and capsular laxity changes with age, exposing both
joints to greater strain, which may explain the rising incidence
of arthritis in both with age. The incidence of arthritis in the
SCJ is less than that in the ACJ, suggesting that the extrinsic
ligaments of the SCJ provide greater stability than the coracoclavicular
ligaments of the ACJ. Instability of the SCJ is rare and can be difficult to distinguish
from medial clavicular physeal or metaphyseal fracture-separation:
cross-sectional imaging is often required. The distinction is important
because the treatment options and outcomes of treatment are dissimilar,
whereas the treatment and outcomes of ACJ separation and fracture
of the lateral clavicle can be similar. Proper recognition and treatment
of traumatic instability is vital as these injuries may be life-threatening.
Instability of the SCJ does not always require surgical intervention.
An accurate diagnosis is required before surgery can be considered,
and we recommend the use of the Stanmore instability triangle. Most
poor outcomes result from a failure to recognise the underlying
pathology. There is a natural reluctance for orthopaedic surgeons to operate
in this area owing to unfamiliarity with, and the close proximity
of, the related vascular structures, but the interposed sternohyoid
and sternothyroid muscles are rarely injured and provide a clear
boundary to the medial retroclavicular space, as well as an anatomical
barrier to unsafe intervention. This review presents current concepts of instability of the SCJ,
describes the relevant surgical anatomy, provides a framework for
diagnosis and management, including physiotherapy, and discusses
the technical challenges of operative intervention. Cite this article:
We identified ten patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of anterior shoulder stabilisation between 1999 and 2005. Their results were compared with 15 patients, matched for age and gender, who had a primary arthroscopic stabilisation during the same period. At a mean follow-up of 37 and 36 months, respectively, the scores for pain and shoulder function improved significantly between the pre-operative and follow-up visits in both groups (p = 0.002), with no significant difference between them (p = 0.4). The UCLA and Rowe shoulder scores improved significantly (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively), with no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.6). Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to recurrent instability showed no differences between the groups (p = 0.2). These results suggest that arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder stabilisation is as reliable as primary arthroscopic stabilisation for patients who have had previous open surgery for recurrent anterior instability.
We reviewed the outcome of arthroscopic stabilisation of anterior glenohumeral instability in young adults using the transglenoid suture technique. A questionnaire was sent to 455 consecutive patients who had undergone this procedure between 1992 and 2000. Of these, 312 patients (68.5%) with 313 affected shoulders and a mean age of 20 years (18 to 28) responded. Outcome was determined by the number of re-dislocations or, in patients who had not re-dislocated, by the disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index. During a mean follow-up of 6.4 years (1 to 14), 177 patients (56%) sustained a re-dislocation, including 70 who required a further operation. In 136 patients (44%) who reported neither re-dislocation nor re-operation, the index scores were good (median 90.4%; 28.9% to 100%). No significant peri- or pre-operative predictors of re-dislocation or re-operation were found. We found a high rate of re-dislocation after transglenoid suture repair in young, physically active patients.
A systematic search of the literature published between January 1985 and February 2006 identified 62 studies which reported the results of arthroscopic procedures for chronic anterior shoulder instability or comparisons between arthroscopic and open surgery. These studies were classified by surgical technique and research methodology, and when appropriate, were included in a meta-analysis. The failure rate of arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation using staples or transglenoid suture techniques appeared to be significantly higher than that of either open surgery or arthroscopic stabilisation using suture anchors or bio-absorbable tacks. Arthroscopic anterior stabilisation using the most effective techniques has a similar rate of failure to open stabilisation after two years.
Pain, stiffness, instability and degenerative arthritis are common sequelae of complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. Operations were carried out to obtain stability, followed by application of a dynamic external fixator in 20 patients with a mean age of 29 years. This provided stability and distraction, and allowed controlled passive movement. Most (70%) of the patients had a chronic lesion and the mean time from injury to surgery was 215 days (3 to 1953). The final mean range of movement was 12 to 86°. Complications included
