Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries. This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.Aims
Methods
The Edinburgh Trauma Triage Clinic (TTC) streamlines outpatient
care through consultant-led ‘virtual’ triage of referrals and the
direct discharge of minor fractures from the Emergency Department.
We compared the patient outcomes for simple fractures of the radial
head, little finger metacarpal, and fifth metatarsal before and
after the implementation of the TTC. A total of 628 patients who had sustained these injuries over
a one-year period were identified. There were 337 patients in the
pre-TTC group and 289 in the post-TTC group. The Disabilities of
the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) or Foot and Ankle Disability
Index (FADI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain
score, satisfaction rates, and return to work/sport were assessed
six months post-injury. The development of late complications was
excluded by an electronic record evaluation at three years post-injury.
A cost analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study compares the outcomes of two methods
of fixation of displaced fractures of the radial neck. The 58 patients
with a mean age of 38.5 years (18 to 56), were treated in a non
randomised study with screws (n = 29) or a plate and screws (n =
29) according to the surgeon’s preference. The patients were reviewed at one year. Radiographs and functional
evaluations were carried out up to one year post-operatively, using
the Broberg and Morrey functional evaluation score, range of movement,
and assessment of complications. The mean functional scores did not differ significantly between
groups (90 (55 to 100) Cite this article:
Most fractures of the radial head are stable
undisplaced or minimally displaced partial fractures without an associated
fracture of the elbow or forearm or ligament injury, where stiffness
following non-operative management is the primary concern. Displaced
unstable fractures of the radial head are usually associated with other
fractures or ligament injuries, and restoration of radiocapitellar
contact by reconstruction or prosthetic replacement of the fractured
head is necessary to prevent subluxation or dislocation of the elbow
and forearm. In fractures with three or fewer fragments (two articular
fragments and the neck) and little or no metaphyseal comminution,
open reduction and internal fixation may give good results. However,
fragmented unstable fractures of the radial head are prone to early
failure of fixation and nonunion when fixed. Excision of the radial
head is associated with good long-term results, but in patients
with instability of the elbow or forearm, prosthetic replacement
is preferred. This review considers the characteristics of stable and unstable
fractures of the radial head, as well as discussing the debatable
aspects of management, in light of the current best evidence. Cite this article:
A total of 14 women and seven men with a mean age of 43 years (18 to 68) who sustained a Mason type IV fracture of the elbow, without an additional type II or III coronoid fracture, were evaluated after a mean of 21 years (14 to 46). Primary treatment included closed elbow reduction followed by immobilisation in a plaster in all cases, with an additional excision of the radial head in 11, partial resection in two and suturing of the annular ligament in two. Delayed radial head excision was performed in two patients and an ulnar nerve transposition in one. The uninjured elbows served as controls. Nine patients had no symptoms, 11 reported slight impairment, and one severe impairment of the elbow. Elbow flexion was impaired by a mean of 3° ( We conclude that most patients with a Mason type IV fracture of the elbow report a good long-term outcome.
Several techniques are available for the treatment of displaced fractures of the neck of the radius in children. We report our experience in 14 children treated by indirect reduction and fixation using an elastic stable intramedullary nail. The patients were followed up for a mean of 28 months. One developed asymptomatic avascular necrosis. The rest had excellent results. One had a neuropraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve, which recovered within six weeks. We advocate elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the closed reduction and fixation of these fractures in children.
