Lateral clavicular physeal injuries in adolescents
are frequently misinterpreted as acromioclavicular dislocations. There
are currently no clear guidelines for the management of these relatively
rare injuries. Non-operative treatment can result in a cosmetic
deformity, warranting resection of the non-remodelled original lateral
clavicle. However, fixation with Kirschner (K)-wires may be associated
with infection and/or prominent metalwork. We report our experience
with a small series of such cases. Between October 2008 and October 2011 five patients with lateral
clavicular physeal fractures (types III, IV and V) presented to
our unit. There were four boys and one girl with a mean age of 12.8
years (9 to 14). Four fractures were significantly displaced and
treated operatively using a tension band suture technique. One grade
III fracture was treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was
26 months (6 to 42). All patients made an uncomplicated recovery. The mean time to
discharge was three months. The QuickDASH score at follow-up was
0 for each patient. No patient developed subsequent growth disturbances. We advocate the surgical treatment of significantly displaced
Grade IV and V fractures to avoid cosmetic deformity. A tension
band suture technique avoids the problems of retained metalwork
and the need for a secondary procedure. Excellent clinical and radiological
results were seen in all our patients. Cite this article:
We assessed the short- to mid-term survival of
metallic press-fit radial head prostheses in patients with radial
head fractures and acute traumatic instability of the elbow. The medical records of 42 patients (16 males, 26 females) with
a mean age of 56 years (23 to 85) with acute unstable elbow injuries,
including a fracture of the radial head requiring metallic replacement
of the radial head, were reviewed retrospectively. Survival of the
prosthesis was assessed from the radiographs of 37 patients after
a mean follow-up of 50 months (12 to 107). The functional results
of 31 patients were assessed using range-of-movement, Mayo elbow
performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and
Hand (DASH) score and the RAND 36-item health survey. At the most recent follow-up 25 prostheses were still well fixed,
nine had been removed because of loosening, and three remained implanted
but were loose. The mean time from implantation to loosening was
11 months (2 to 24). Radiolucent lines that developed around the
prosthesis before removal were mild in three patients, moderate
in one and severe in five. Range of movement parameters and mass
grip strength were significantly lower in the affected elbow than
in the unaffected side. The mean MEPS score was 86 (40 to 100) and
the mean DASH score was 23 (0 to 81). According to RAND-36 scores,
patients had more pain and lower
We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. A series of 431 patients with disorders of the upper limb completed the Hand20 and the Japanese version of the DASH (DASH-JSSH) questionnaire. The norms for Hand20 scores were determined in another cross-sectional study. Most patients had no difficulty in completing the Hand20 questionnaire, whereas the DASH-JSSH had a significantly higher rate of missing data. The standard score for the Hand20 was smaller than the reported norms for the DASH. Our study showed that the Hand20 questionnaire provided validation comparable with that of the DASH-JSSH. Explanatory illustrations and short questions which were easy-to-understand led to better rates of response and fewer missing data, even in elderly individuals with cognitive deterioration.
In order to compare the outcome from surgical repair and physiotherapy, 103 patients with symptomatic small and medium-sized tears of the rotator cuff were randomly allocated to one of the two approaches. The primary outcome measure was the Constant score, and secondary outcome measures included the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Short Form 36 Health Survey and subscores for shoulder movement, pain, strength and patient satisfaction. Scores were taken at baseline and after six and 12 months by a blinded assessor. Nine patients (18%) with insufficient benefit from physiotherapy after at least 15 treatment sessions underwent secondary surgical treatment. Analysis of between-group differences showed better results for the surgery group on the Constant scale (difference 13.0 points, p − 0.002), on the American Shoulder and Elbow surgeons scale (difference 16.1 points, p <
0.0005), for pain-free abduction (difference 28.8°, p = 0.003) and for reduction in pain (difference on a visual analogue scale −1.7 cm, p <
0.0005).
Between 1998 and 2007, 22 patients with fractures of the scapula had operative treatment more than three weeks after injury. The indications for operation included displaced intra-articular fractures, medialisation of the glenohumeral joint, angular deformity, or displaced double lesions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Radiological and functional outcomes were obtained for 16 of 22 patients. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) and Short form-36 scores were collected for 14 patients who were operated on after March 2002. The mean delay from injury to surgery was 30 days (21 to 57). The mean follow-up was for 27 months (12 to 72). At the last review the mean DASH score was 14 (0 to 41). Of the 16 patients with follow-up, 13 returned to their previous employment and recreational activities without restrictions. No wound complications, infection or nonunion occurred. Malunion of the scapula can be prevented by surgical treatment of fractures in patients with delayed presentation. Surgery is safe, effective, and gives acceptable functional results.
We have investigated the outcome of arthroscopic revision surgery for recurrent instability of the shoulder after failed primary anterior stabilisation. We identified 40 patients with failed primary open or arthroscopic anterior stabilisation of the shoulder who had been treated by revision arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction and followed up for a mean of 36 months (12 to 87). There were 34 men and six women with a mean age of 33.1 years (15 to 48). Details of the patients, the technique of the primary procedure, the operative findings at revision and the clinical outcome were evaluated by reviewing the medical records, physical examination and the use of the Western Ontario shoulder instability index score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the health status questionnaire 12. Recurrent instability persisted in four patients after the revision arthroscopic procedure. At the final follow-up, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.1 (17.5 to 99.5) and the mean Western Ontario shoulder instability index score was 68.2 (20 to 98.2). Quality-of-life scoring showed good to excellent results in most patients. Arthroscopic revision capsulolabral reconstruction can provide a satisfactory outcome in selected patients for recurrent instability of the shoulder provided that no large Hill-Sachs lesion is present.
We developed a questionnaire to assess patient-reported outcome after surgery of the elbow from interviews with patients. Initially, 17 possible items with five response options were included. A prospective study of 104 patients (107 elbow operations) was carried out to analyse the underlying factor structure, dimensionality, internal and test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the questionnaire items. This was compared with the Mayo Elbow performance score clinical scale, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and the Short-Form (SF-36) General Health Survey. In total, five questions were considered inappropriate, which resulted in the final 12-item questionnaire, which has been referred to as the Oxford elbow score. This comprises three unidimensional domains, ‘elbow function’, ‘pain’ and ‘social-psychological’; with each domain comprising four items with good measurement properties. This new 12-item Oxford elbow score is a valid measure of the outcome of surgery of the elbow.
