Louis Pasteur once said that: “Fortune favours
the prepared mind.” As one of the great scientists who contributed
to the fight against infection, he emphasised the importance of
being prepared at all times to recognise infection and deal with
it. Despite the many scientific discoveries and technological advances,
such as the advent of antibiotics and the use of sterile techniques,
infection continues to be a problem that haunts orthopaedic surgeons
and inflicts suffering on patients. The medical community has implemented many practices with the
intention of preventing infection and treating it effectively when
it occurs. Although high-level evidence may support some of these
practices, many are based on little to no scientific foundation.
Thus, around the world, there is great variation in practices for
the prevention and management of periprosthetic joint infection. This paper summaries the instigation, conduct and findings of
a recent International Consensus Meeting on Surgical Site and Periprosthetic
Joint Infection. Cite this article:
Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard
for treatment of
Femoral revision after cemented total hip replacement
(THR) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement
removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently
inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. Femoral impaction allografting has been widely used in revision
surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur. In combination
with a primary cemented stem, impaction grafting allows for femoral
bone restoration through incorporation and remodelling of the impacted
morsellized bone graft by the host skeleton. Cavitary bone defects
affecting meta-physis and diaphysis leading to a wide femoral shaft,
are ideal indications for this technique. Cancellous allograft bone
chips of 1 mm to 2 mm size are used, and tapered into the canal
with rods of increasing diameters. To impact the bone chips into
the femoral canal a prosthesis dummy of the same dimensions of the definitive
cemented stem is driven into the femur to ensure that the chips
are very firmly impacted. Finally, a standard stem is cemented into
the neo-medullary canal using bone cement. To date several studies have shown favourable results with this
technique, with some excellent long-term results reported in independent
clinical centres worldwide. Cite this article:
Based on the first implementation of mixing antibiotics
into bone cement in the 1970s, the Endo-Klinik has used one stage
exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in over 85% of cases.
Looking carefully at current literature and guidelines for PJI treatment,
there is no clear evidence that a two stage procedure has a higher
success rate than a one-stage approach. A cemented one-stage exchange
potentially offers certain advantages, mainly based on the need
for only one operative procedure, reduced antibiotics and hospitalisation time.
In order to fulfill a one-stage approach, there are obligatory pre-,
peri- and post-operative details that need to be meticulously respected,
and are described in detail. Essential pre-operative diagnostic
testing is based on the joint aspiration with an exact identification
of any bacteria. The presence of a positive bacterial culture and
respective antibiogram are essential, to specify the antibiotics
to be loaded to the bone cement, which allows a high local antibiotic
elution directly at the surgical side. A specific antibiotic treatment
plan is generated by a microbiologist. The surgical success relies
on the complete removal of all pre-existing hardware, including
cement and restrictors and an aggressive and complete debridement
of any infected soft tissues and bone material. Post-operative systemic
antibiotic administration is usually completed after only ten to
14 days. Cite this article:
