Aims. The aim of this study was to report the clinical, functional
and radiological outcomes of children and adolescents with tibial
fractures treated using the Ilizarov method. Patients and Methods. Between 2013 and 2016 a total of 74 children with 75 tibial fractures
underwent treatment at our major trauma centre using an Ilizarov
frame. Demographic and clinical information from a prospective database
was supplemented by routine functional and psychological assessment
and a retrospective review of the notes and radiographs. Results. Of the 75 fractures, 26 (35%) were open injuries, of which six
(8%) had segmental bone loss. There were associated physeal injuries
in 18 (24%), and 12 (16%) involved conversion of treatment following
failure of previous management. The remaining children had a closed
unstable fracture or significant soft-tissue compromise. The median
follow-up was 16 months (7 to 31). All fractures united with a median duration in a frame of 3.6
months (interquartile range 3.1 to 4.6); there was no significant
difference between the types of fracture and the demographics of
the patients. There were no serious complications and no secondary
procedures were required to achieve union. Health-related quality
of life measures were available for 60 patients (80%) at a minimum
of six months after removal of the frame. These indicated a good return
to function (median Paediatric quality of life score, 88.0; interquartile
range 70.3 to 100). Conclusion. The Ilizarov method is a safe, effective and reliable method
for the treatment of complex
Between 2005 and 2010 ten consecutive children
with high-energy open diaphyseal tibial fractures were treated by early
reduction and application of a programmable circular external fixator.
They were all male with a mean age of 11.5 years (5.2 to 15.4),
and they were followed for a mean of 34.5 months (6 to 77). Full
weight-bearing was allowed immediately post-operatively. The mean
time from application to removal of the frame was 16 weeks (12 to
21). The mean deformity following removal of the frame was 0.15°
(0° to 1.5°) of coronal angulation, 0.2° (0° to 2°) sagittal angulation,
1.1 mm (0 to 10) coronal translation, and 0.5 mm (0 to 2) sagittal
translation. All patients achieved consolidated bony union and satisfactory
wound healing. There were no cases of delayed or nonunion, compartment
syndrome or neurovascular injury. Four patients had a mild superficial
pin site infection; all settled with a single course of oral antibiotics.
No patient had a deep infection or re-fracture following removal
of the frame. The time to union was comparable with, or better than,
other published methods of stabilisation for these injuries. The
stable fixator configuration not only facilitates management of
the accompanying soft-tissue injury but enables anatomical post-injury
alignment, which is important in view of the limited remodelling
potential of the tibia in children aged >
ten years. Where appropriate
expertise exists, we recommend this technique for the management
of high-energy open tibial fractures in children.
