A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.Aims
Methods
We present a review of litigation claims relating
to foot and ankle surgery in the NHS in England during the 17-year period
between 1995 and 2012. A freedom of information request was made to obtain data from
the NHS litigation authority (NHSLA) relating to orthopaedic claims,
and the foot and ankle claims were reviewed. During this period of time, a total of 10 273 orthopaedic claims
were made, of which 1294 (12.6%) were related to the foot and ankle.
1036 were closed, which comprised of 1104 specific complaints. Analysis
was performed using the complaints as the denominator. The cost
of settling these claims was more than £36 million. There were 372 complaints (33.7%) involving the ankle, of which
273 (73.4%) were related to trauma. Conditions affecting the first
ray accounted for 236 (21.4%), of which 232 (98.3%) concerned elective
practice. Overall, claims due to diagnostic errors accounted for
210 (19.0%) complaints, 208 (18.8%) from alleged incompetent surgery
and 149 (13.5%) from alleged mismanagement. Our findings show that the incorrect, delayed or missed diagnosis
of conditions affecting the foot and ankle is a key area for improvement,
especially in trauma practice. Cite this article:
