Since the introduction of the National Institute
for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on thromboprophylaxis
and the use of extended thromboprophylaxis with new oral agents,
there have been reports of complications arising as a result of
their use. We have looked at the incidence of wound complications
after the introduction of dabigatran for thromboprophylaxis in our
unit. We investigated the rate of venous thromboembolism and wound
leakage in 1728 patients undergoing primary joint replacement, both
before and after the introduction of dabigatran, and following its
subsequent withdrawal from our unit. We found that the use of dabigatran led to a significant increase
in post-operative wound leakage (20% with dabigatran, 5% with a
multimodal regimen; p <
0.001), which also resulted in an increased
duration of hospital stay. The rate of thromboembolism in patients
receiving dabigatran was higher (1.3%) than in those receiving the multimodal
thromboprophylaxis regimen, including low molecular weight heparin
as an inpatient and the extended use of aspirin (0.3%, p = 0.047).
We have ceased the use of dabigatran for thromboprophylaxis in these
patients. Cite this article:
We performed a meta-analysis of modern total
joint replacement (TJR) to determine the post-operative mortality and
the cause of death using different thromboprophylactic regimens
as follows: 1) no routine chemothromboprophylaxis (NRC); 2) Potent
anticoagulation (PA) (unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, ximelagatran,
fondaparinux or rivaroxaban); 3) Potent anticoagulation combined
(PAC) with regional anaesthesia and/or pneumatic compression devices
(PCDs); 4) Warfarin (W); 5) Warfarin combined (WAC) with regional anaesthesia
and/or PCD; and 6)
