The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of revision for distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) performed as a primary procedure for native knee fractures using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR). Data from the AOANJRR were obtained for DFA performed as primary procedures for native knee fractures from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020. Pathological fractures and revision for failed internal fixation were excluded. The five prostheses identified were the Global Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System, the Orthopaedic Salvage System, and the Segmental System. Patient demographic data (age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade) were obtained, where available. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were used to determine the rate of revision, and the reasons for revision and mortality data were examined.Aims
Methods
The best method of treating unstable pelvic fractures that involve
the obturator ring is still a matter for debate. This study compared
three methods of treatment: nonoperative, isolated posterior fixation
and combined anteroposterior stabilization. The study used data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry and
compared patients undergoing conservative management (n = 2394),
surgical treatment (n = 1345) and transpubic surgery, including
posterior stabilization (n = 730) with isolated posterior osteosynthesis
(n = 405) in non-complex Type B and C fractures that only involved the
obturator ring anteriorly. Calculated odds ratios were adjusted
for potential confounders. Outcome criteria were intraoperative
and general short-term complications, the incidence of nerve injuries,
and mortality.Aims
Patients and Methods
It is becoming increasingly common for a patient
to have ipsilateral hip and knee replacements. The inter-prosthetic (IP)
distance, the distance between the tips of hip and knee prostheses,
has been thought to be associated with an increased risk of IP fracture.
Small gap distances are generally assumed to act as stress risers,
although there is no real biomechanical evidence to support this. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IP
distance, cortical thickness and bone mineral density on the likelihood
of an IP femoral fracture. A total of 18 human femur specimens were randomised into three
groups by bone density and cortical thickness. For each group, a
defined IP distance of 35 mm, 80 mm or 160 mm was created by choosing
the appropriate lengths of component. The maximum fracture strength
was determined using a four-point bending test. The fracture force of all three groups was similar (p = 0.498).
There was a highly significant correlation between the cortical
area and the fracture strength (r = 0.804, p <
0.001), whereas
bone density showed no influence. This study suggests that the IP distance has little influence
on fracture strength in IP femoral fractures: the thickness of the
cortex seems to be the decisive factor. Cite this article:
We undertook a radiological analysis of 186 standard Souter implants to determine survivorship and to analyse the pattern of failure in those needing revision. The implants had been inserted as a primary procedure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow at our hospital over the last 12 years. Taking revision as an endpoint, the survivorship after 12 years was 87%. If, however, revision and loosening, defined as the Hindex value equivalent to demarcation of 1 mm around the whole implant, are also included, the survivorship falls to 80%. Of the 24 implants revised, 18 (75%) were for problems with the humeral component, three (12.5%) with the ulnar component and three (12.5%) for instability.
