Although it is clear that opening-wedge high
tibial osteotomy (HTO) changes alignment in the coronal plane, which is
its objective, it is not clear how this procedure affects knee kinematics
throughout the range of joint movement and in other planes. Our research question was: how does opening-wedge HTO change
three-dimensional tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in
loaded flexion in patients with varus deformity?Three-dimensional
kinematics were assessed over 0° to 60° of loaded flexion using
an MRI method before and after opening-wedge HTO in a cohort of
13 men (14 knees). Results obtained from an iterative statistical
model found that at six and 12 months after operation, opening-wedge
HTO caused increased anterior translation of the tibia (mean 2.6
mm, p <
0.001), decreased proximal translation of the patella
(mean –2.2 mm, p <
0.001), decreased patellar spin (mean –1.4°,
p <
0.05), increased patellar tilt (mean 2.2°, p <
0.05) and
changed three other parameters. The mean Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Arthritis Index improved significantly (p <
0.001)
from 49.6 (standard deviation ( The three-dimensional kinematic changes found may be important
in explaining inconsistency in clinical outcomes, and suggest that
measures in addition to coronal plane alignment should be considered. Cite this article:
We assessed the reliability, accuracy and variability of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique. A total of 50 closed-wedge HTO procedures were performed using the navigation system, and compared with 50 HTOs that had been performed with the conventional technique. In the navigation group, the mean mechanical axis prior to osteotomy was varus 8.2°, and the mean mechanical axis following fixation was valgus 3.6°. On the radiographs the mean pre-operative mechanical axis was varus 7.3°, and the mean post-operative mechanical axis was valgus 2.1°. There was a positive correlation between the measured data taken under navigation and by radiographs (r >
0.3, p <
0.05). The mean correction angle was significantly more accurate in the navigation group (p <
0.002). The variability of the correction was significantly lower in the navigation group (2.3°