The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is a pivotal
articulation in the linked system of the upper limb girdle, providing
load-bearing in compression while resisting displacement in tension
or distraction at the manubrium sterni. The SCJ and acromioclavicular
joint (ACJ) both have a small surface area of contact protected
by an intra-articular fibrocartilaginous disc and are supported
by strong extrinsic and intrinsic capsular ligaments. The function
of load-sharing in the upper limb by bulky periscapular and thoracobrachial
muscles is extremely important to the longevity of both joints.
Ligamentous and capsular laxity changes with age, exposing both
joints to greater strain, which may explain the rising incidence
of arthritis in both with age. The incidence of arthritis in the
SCJ is less than that in the ACJ, suggesting that the extrinsic
ligaments of the SCJ provide greater stability than the coracoclavicular
ligaments of the ACJ. Instability of the SCJ is rare and can be difficult to distinguish
from medial clavicular physeal or metaphyseal fracture-separation:
cross-sectional imaging is often required. The distinction is important
because the treatment options and outcomes of treatment are dissimilar,
whereas the treatment and outcomes of ACJ separation and fracture
of the lateral clavicle can be similar. Proper recognition and treatment
of traumatic instability is vital as these injuries may be life-threatening.
Instability of the SCJ does not always require surgical intervention.
An accurate diagnosis is required before surgery can be considered,
and we recommend the use of the Stanmore instability triangle. Most
poor outcomes result from a failure to recognise the underlying
pathology. There is a natural reluctance for orthopaedic surgeons to operate
in this area owing to unfamiliarity with, and the close proximity
of, the related vascular structures, but the interposed sternohyoid
and sternothyroid muscles are rarely injured and provide a clear
boundary to the medial retroclavicular space, as well as an anatomical
barrier to unsafe intervention. This review presents current concepts of instability of the SCJ,
describes the relevant surgical anatomy, provides a framework for
diagnosis and management, including physiotherapy, and discusses
the technical challenges of operative intervention. Cite this article:
Lateral clavicular physeal injuries in adolescents
are frequently misinterpreted as acromioclavicular dislocations. There
are currently no clear guidelines for the management of these relatively
rare injuries. Non-operative treatment can result in a cosmetic
deformity, warranting resection of the non-remodelled original lateral
clavicle. However, fixation with Kirschner (K)-wires may be associated
with infection and/or prominent metalwork. We report our experience
with a small series of such cases. Between October 2008 and October 2011 five patients with lateral
clavicular physeal fractures (types III, IV and V) presented to
our unit. There were four boys and one girl with a mean age of 12.8
years (9 to 14). Four fractures were significantly displaced and
treated operatively using a tension band suture technique. One grade
III fracture was treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was
26 months (6 to 42). All patients made an uncomplicated recovery. The mean time to
discharge was three months. The QuickDASH score at follow-up was
0 for each patient. No patient developed subsequent growth disturbances. We advocate the surgical treatment of significantly displaced
Grade IV and V fractures to avoid cosmetic deformity. A tension
band suture technique avoids the problems of retained metalwork
and the need for a secondary procedure. Excellent clinical and radiological
results were seen in all our patients. Cite this article:
We evaluated the biomechanical properties of two different methods of fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Biomechanical testing of the two groups, locking plate alone (LP), and locking plate with a fibular strut graft (LPSG), was performed using seven pairs of human cadaveric humeri. Cyclical loads between 10 N and 80 N at 5 Hz were applied for 1 000 000 cycles. Immediately after cycling, an increasing axial load was applied at a rate of displacement of 5 mm/min. The displacement of the construct, maximum failure load, stiffness and mode of failure were compared. The displacement was significantly less in the LPSG group than in the LP group (p = 0.031). All maximum failure loads and measures of stiffness in the LPSG group were significantly higher than those in the LP group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively). In the LP group, varus collapse and plate bending were seen. In the LPSG group, the humeral head cut out and the fibular strut grafts fractured. No broken plates or screws were seen in either group. We conclude that strut graft augmentation significantly increases both the maximum failure load and the initial stiffness of this construct compared with a locking plate alone.
We report the use of a free vascularised iliac bone graft in the treatment of 21 patients (19 men and 2 women) with an avascular nonunion of the scaphoid in which conventional bone grafting had previously failed. The mean age of the patients was 32 years (23 to 46) and the dominant wrist was affected in 14. The mean interval from fracture to the vascularised bone grafting was 39 months (9 to 62). Pre-operative MRI showed no contrast enhancement in the proximal fragment in any patient. Fracture union was assessed radiologically or with CT scans if the radiological appearances were inconclusive. At a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (2 to 11) union was obtained in 16 patients. The remaining five patients with a persistent nonunion continued to experience pain, reduced grip strength and limited range of wrist movement. In the successfully treated patients the grip strength and range of movement did not recover to match the uninjured side. Prevention of progressive carpal collapse, the absence of donor site morbidity, good subjective results and pain relief, justifies this procedure in the treatment of recalcitrant nonunion of the scaphoid.
We treated 32 displaced mallet finger fractures by a two extension block Kirschner-wire technique. The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 49 months (25 to 84). The mean joint surface involvement was 38.4% (33% to 50%) and 18 patients (56%) had accompanying joint subluxation. All 32 fractures united with a mean time to union of 6.2 weeks (5.1 to 8.2). Congruent joint surfaces and anatomical reduction were seen in all cases. The mean flexion of the distal interphalangeal joints was 83.1° (75° to 90°) and the mean extension loss was 0.9° (0° to 7°). No digit had a prominent dorsal bump or a recurrent mallet deformity. We believe that this technique, when properly applied, produces satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically.
We reviewed 39 patients with displaced three- and four-part fractures of the humerus. In 21 patients (group A) we had used an anatomical prosthesis for the humeral head and in 18 (group B) an implant designed for fractures. When followed up at a mean of 29.3 months after surgery the overall Constant score was 51.9 points; in group A it was 51.5 and in group B 52.4 points. The subjective satisfaction of the patients was assessed using a numerical rating scale and was similar in both groups. In group A complete healing of the tuberosities was found in 29% and 50% in group B. Partial integration was seen in 29% of group A and in only one patient in group B, while resorption was noted in 43% of group A and 44% of group B. The functional outcome was significantly better in patients with complete or partial healing of the tuberosities (p = 0.022). The specific trauma prosthesis did not lead to better healing of the tuberosities. The difference in clinical outcome obtained by the two designs did not reach statistical significance.