To review the evidence and reach consensus on recommendations for follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty. A programme of work was conducted, including: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature; analysis of routine national datasets to identify pre-, peri-, and postoperative predictors of mid-to-late term revision; prospective data analyses from 560 patients to understand how patients present for revision surgery; qualitative interviews with NHS managers and orthopaedic surgeons; and health economic modelling. Finally, a consensus meeting considered all the work and agreed the final recommendations and research areas.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to conduct the largest low contact stress (LCS) retrieval study to elucidate the failure mechanisms of the Porocoat and Duofix femoral component. The latter design was voluntarily recalled by the manufacturer. Uncemented LCS explants were divided into three groups: Duofix, Porocoat, and mixed. Demographics, polyethylene wear, tissue ingrowth, and metallurgical analyses were performed.Aims
Materials and Methods
Increasing
We examined the risk of thrombotic and major
bleeding events in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement
(THR and TKR) treated with thromboprophylaxis, using nationwide
population-based databases. We identified 83 756 primary procedures
performed between 1997 and 2011. The outcomes were symptomatic venous thromboembolism
(VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, death and major bleeding
requiring hospitalisation within 90 days of surgery. A total of 1114 (1.3%) and 483 (0.6%) patients experienced VTE
and bleeding, respectively. The annual risk of VTE varied between
0.9% and 1.6%, and of bleeding between 0.4% and 0.8%. The risk of
VTE and bleeding was unchanged over a 15-year period. A total of
0.7% of patients died within 90 days, with a decrease from 1% in
1997 to 0.6% in 2011 (p <
0.001). A high level of comorbidity
and general anaesthesia were strong risk factors for both VTE and
bleeding, with no difference between THR and TKR patients. The risk
of both MI and stroke was 0.5%, which remained unchanged during
the study period. In this cohort study of patients undergoing THR and TKR patients
in routine clinical practice, approximately 3% experienced VTE,
MI, stroke or bleeding. These risks did not decline during the 15-year
study period, but the risk of dying fell substantially. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to perform a cost–utility
analysis of total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). Arthritis is
a disabling condition that leads to long-term deterioration in quality
of life. Total joint replacement, despite being one of the greatest
advances in medicine of the modern era, has recently come under
scrutiny. The National Health Service (NHS) has competing demands,
and resource allocation is challenging in times of economic restraint. Patients
who underwent THR (n = 348) or TKR (n = 323) between January and
July 2010 in one Scottish region were entered into a prospective
arthroplasty database. A health–utility score was derived from the
EuroQol (EQ-5D) score pre-operatively and at one year, and was combined
with individual life expectancy to derive the quality-adjusted life years
(QALYs) gained. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare
QALYs gained between procedures, while controlling for baseline
differences. The number of QALYs gained was higher after THR than
after TKR (6.5 Cite this article:
