The optimal management of intracapsular fractures of the femoral
neck in independently mobile patients remains open to debate. Successful
fixation obviates the limitations of arthroplasty for this group
of patients. However, with fixation failure rates as high as 30%,
the outcome of revision surgery to salvage total hip arthroplasty
(THA) must be considered. We carried out a systematic review to
compare the outcomes of salvage THA and primary THA for intracapsular
fractures of the femoral neck. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) compliant systematic review, using the
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries databases. A meta-analysis
was performed where possible, and a narrative synthesis when a meta-analysis
was not possible.Aims
Patients and Methods
The effects of surgical approach in total hip
replacement on health-related quality of life and long-term pain
and satisfaction are unknown. From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty
Register, we extracted data on all patients that had received a
total hip replacement for osteoarthritis through either the posterior
or the direct lateral approach, with complete pre- and one-year
post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A total
of 42 233 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 4962
also had complete six-year PROM data. The posterior approach resulted in
an increased mean satisfaction score of 15 ( Cite this article:
