Despite being one of the most common injuries around the elbow, the optimal treatment of olecranon fractures is far from established and stimulates debate among both general orthopaedic trauma surgeons and upper limb specialists. It is almost universally accepted that stable non-displaced fractures can be safely treated nonoperatively with minimal specialist input. Internal fixation is recommended for the vast majority of displaced fractures, with a range of techniques and implants to choose from. However, there is concern regarding the complication rates, largely related to symptomatic metalwork resulting in high rates of implant removal. As the number of elderly patients sustaining these injuries increases, we are becoming more aware of the issues associated with fixation in osteoporotic bone and the often fragile soft-tissue envelope in this group. Given this, there is evidence to support an increasing role for nonoperative management in this high-risk demographic group, even in those presenting with displaced and/or multifragmentary fracture patterns. This review summarizes the available literature to date, focusing predominantly on the management techniques and available implants for stable fractures of the olecranon. It also offers some insights into the potential avenues for future research, in the hope of addressing some of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered. Cite this article:
As residency training programmes around the globe
move towards competency-based medical education (CBME), there is
a need to review current teaching and assessment practices as they
relate to education in orthopaedic trauma. Assessment is the cornerstone
of CBME, as it not only helps to determine when a trainee is fit
to practice independently, but it also provides feedback on performance
and guides the development of competence. Although a standardised
core knowledge base for trauma care has been developed by the leading
national accreditation bodies and international agencies that teach
and perform research in orthopaedic trauma, educators have not yet established
optimal methods for assessing trainees’ performance in managing
orthopaedic trauma patients. This review describes the existing knowledge from the literature
on assessment in orthopaedic trauma and highlights initiatives that
have recently been undertaken towards CBME in the United Kingdom,
Canada and the United States. In order to support a CBME approach, programmes need to improve
the frequency and quality of assessments and improve on current
formative and summative feedback techniques in order to enhance
resident education in orthopaedic trauma. Cite this article:
