Aims. This study aimed to use intraoperative free electromyography to examine how the placement of a retractor at different positions along the anterior acetabular wall may affect the femoral nerve during total hip arthroplasty (THA) when undertaken using the direct anterior approach (THA-DAA). Methods. Intraoperative free electromyography was performed during primary THA-DAA in 82 patients (94 hips). The highest position of the anterior acetabular wall was defined as the “12 o’clock” position (middle position) when the patient was in supine position. After exposure of the acetabulum, a retractor was sequentially placed at the ten, 11, 12, one, and two o’clock positions (right hip; from superior to inferior positions). Action potentials in the femoral nerve were monitored with each placement, and the incidence of positive reactions (defined as explosive, frequent, or continuous action potentials, indicating that the nerve was being compressed) were recorded as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of positive reactions caused by removing the femoral head, and by placing a retractor during femoral exposure; and the incidence of femoral nerve palsy, as detected using manual testing of the strength of the quadriceps muscle. Results. Positive reactions were significantly less frequent when the retractor was placed at the ten (15/94; 16.0%), 11 (12/94; 12.8%), or 12 o’clock positions (19/94; 20.2%), than at the one (37/94; 39.4%) or two o’clock positions (39/94; 41.5%) (p < 0.050). Positive reactions also occurred when the femoral head was removed (28/94; 29.8%), and when a retractor was placed around the proximal femur (34/94; 36.2%) or medial femur (27/94; 28.7%) during femoral exposure. After surgery, no patient had reduced strength in the quadriceps muscle. Conclusion. Placing the anterior acetabular retractor at the one or two o’clock positions (right hip; inferior positions) during THA-DAA can increase the rate of
The purpose of this study was to establish whether
exploration and neurolysis is an effective method of treating neuropathic
pain in patients with a sciatic nerve palsy after total hip replacement
(THR). A total of 56 patients who had undergone this surgery at
our hospital between September 1999 and September 2010 were retrospectively identified.
There were 42 women and 14 men with a mean age at exploration of
61.2 years (28 to 80). The sciatic nerve palsy had been sustained
by 46 of the patients during a primary THR, five during a revision
THR and five patients during hip resurfacing. The mean pre-operative
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was 7.59 (2 to 10), the mean
post-operative VAS was 3.77 (0 to 10), with a resulting mean improvement
of 3.82 (0 to 10). The pre- and post-neurolysis VAS scores were
significantly different (p <
0.001). Based on the findings of
our study, we recommend this form of surgery over conservative management
in patients with neuropathic pain associated with a sciatic nerve
palsy after THR. Cite this article:
We investigated the relationship of the inferior gluteal nerve to gluteus maximus by dissecting the muscle in 12 fresh-frozen and formalin-treated cadavers. The anatomy was recorded using still digital photography. The course of the inferior gluteal nerve was carefully traced and was noted to enter the deep surface of gluteus maximus approximately 5 cm from the tip of the greater trochanter of the femur. The susceptibility of the nerve to injury during a posterior approach to the hip may be explained by its close relationship to the deep surface of gluteus maximus. It is easily damaged before it has been seen if the muscle is split and parted more than 5 cm from the tip of the greater trochanter of the femur. We suggest that a modified posterior approach be used to expose the hip to avoid damage to this nerve.
We have investigated whether control of balance is improved during stance and gait and sit-to-stand tasks after unilateral total hip replacement undertaken for osteoarthritis of the hip. We examined 25 patients with a mean age of 67 years ( Before surgery, control of balance during gait and sit-to-stand tasks was abnormal in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip, while balance during stance was similar to that of the healthy control group. After total hip replacement, there was a progressive improvement at four and 12 months for most gait and sit-to-stand tasks and in the time needed to complete them. By 12 months, the values approached those of the control group. However, trunk pitch (forwards-backwards) and roll (side-to-side) velocities were less stable (greater than the control) when walking over barriers as was roll for the sit-to-stand task, indicative of a residual deficit of balance. Our data suggest that patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip have marked deficits of balance in gait tasks, which may explain the increased risk of falling which has been reported in some epidemiological studies. However, total hip replacement may help these patients to regain almost normal control of balance for some gait tasks, as we found in this study. Despite the improvement in most components of balance, however, the deficit in the control of trunk velocity during gait suggests that a cautious follow-up is required after total hip replacement regarding the risk of a fall, especially in the elderly.
We describe a new technique of reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The outer iliac table just above the deficient acetabulum is osteotomised and slid downwards. We have termed this an iliac sliding graft. Between October 1997 and November 2001, cementless total hip arthroplasty with an iliac sliding graft was performed on 19 patients (19 hips) with acetabular dysplasia. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (2 to 6). The mean pre-operative Harris hip score was 45.1 which improved significantly to 85.3 at the time of the final follow-up. No patient had post-operative abductor dysfunction. Incorporation of the graft was seen after two to three months in all patients. Resorption of the graft and radiolucencies were infrequent. This technique is a useful alternative to femoral head autografting when the patient’s own femoral head cannot be used.
