Implant waste during total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a significant cost to the USA healthcare system. While studies have explored methods to improve THA cost-effectiveness, the literature comparing the proportions of implant waste by intraoperative technology used during THA is limited. The aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the use of enabling technologies during THA results in a smaller proportion of wasted implants compared to navigation-guided and conventional manual THA; 2) determine the proportion of wasted implants by implant type; and 3) examine the effects of surgeon experience on rates of implant waste by technology used. We identified 104,420 implants either implanted or wasted during 18,329 primary THAs performed on 16,724 patients between January 2018 and June 2022 at our institution. THAs were separated by technology used: robotic-assisted (n = 4,171), imageless navigation (n = 6,887), and manual (n = 7,721). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of implant waste during primary THA.Aims
Methods
Hip dysplasia (HD) leads to premature osteoarthritis. Timely detection and correction of HD has been shown to improve pain, functional status, and hip longevity. Several time-consuming radiological measurements are currently used to confirm HD. An artificial intelligence (AI) software named HIPPO automatically locates anatomical landmarks on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and performs the needed measurements. The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this tool as compared to multi-reader evaluation in clinically proven cases of adult HD. The secondary aims were to assess the time savings achieved and evaluate inter-reader assessment. A consecutive preoperative sample of 130 HD patients (256 hips) was used. This cohort included 82.3% females (n = 107) and 17.7% males (n = 23) with median patient age of 28.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 22.5 to 37.2). Three trained readers’ measurements were compared to AI outputs of lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, pelvic obliquity, Tönnis angle, Sharp’s angle, and femoral head coverage. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were obtained.Aims
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual-mobility components (DM-THA) has been shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in the setting of a displaced neck of femur fracture compared to conventional single-bearing THA (SB-THA). This study assesses if the clinical benefit of a reduced dislocation rate can justify the incremental cost increase of DM-THA compared to SB-THA. Costs and benefits were established for patients aged 75 to 79 years over a five-year time period in the base case from the Canadian Health Payer’s perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the base case model conclusions.Aims
Methods
To examine incidence of complications associated with outpatient
total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to see if medical comorbidities
are associated with complications or extended length of stay. From June 2013 to December 2016, 1279 patients underwent 1472
outpatient THAs at our free-standing ambulatory surgery centre.
Records were reviewed to determine frequency of pre-operative medical
comorbidities and post-operative need for overnight stay and complications
which arose.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this systematic review was to report the rate of dislocation
following the use of dual mobility (DM) acetabular components in
primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines
was performed. A comprehensive search of Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane
Library and Embase (Scopus) was conducted for English articles between
January 1974 and March 2016 using various combinations of the keywords “dual
mobility”, “dual-mobility”, “tripolar”, “double-mobility”, “double
mobility”, “hip”, “cup”, “socket”. The following data were extracted
by two investigators independently: demographics, whether the operation
was a primary or revision THA, length of follow-up, the design of
the components, diameter of the femoral head, and type of fixation
of the acetabular component.Aims
Materials and Methods
A retrospective review was performed of patients
undergoing primary cementless total knee replacement (TKR) using
porous tantalum performed by a group of surgical trainees. Clinical
and radiological follow-up involved 79 females and 26 males encompassing
115 knees. The mean age was 66.9 years (36 to 85). Mean follow-up
was 7 years (2 to 11). Tibial and patellar components were porous
tantalum monoblock implants, and femoral components were posterior
stabilised (PS) in design with cobalt–chromium fibre mesh. Radiological
assessments were made for implant positioning, alignment, radiolucencies,
lysis, and loosening. There was 95.7% survival of implants. There
was no radiological evidence of loosening and no osteolysis found.
No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Average tibial
component alignment was 1.4° of varus (4°of valgus to 9° varus),
and 6.2° (3° anterior to 15° posterior) of posterior slope. Mean
femoral component alignment was 6.6° (1° to 11°) of valgus. Mean tibiofemoral
alignment was 5.6° of valgus (7° varus to 16° valgus). Patellar
tilt was a mean of 2.4° lateral (5° medial to 28° lateral). Patient
satisfaction with improvement in pain was 91%. Cementless TKR incorporating
porous tantalum yielded good clinical and radiological outcomes
at a mean of follow-up of seven-years. Cite this article:
In March 2012, an algorithm for the treatment
of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip was introduced in our academic
department of Orthopaedic Surgery. It included the use of specified
implants for particular patterns of fracture. In this cohort study,
102 consecutive patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture
were followed prospectively (post-algorithm group). Another 117
consecutive patients who had been treated immediately prior to the
implementation of the algorithm were identified retrospectively
as a control group (pre-algorithm group). The total cost of the
implants prior to implementation of the algorithm was $357 457 (mean:
$3055 (1947 to 4133)); compared with $255 120 (mean: $2501 (1052
to 4133)) after its implementation. There was a trend toward fewer complications
in patients who were treated using the algorithm (33% pre- The implementation of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment
of intertrochanteric fractures reduced costs while maintaining quality
of care with a lower rate of complications and re-admissions. Cite this article:
The debate whether to use cemented or uncemented
components in primary total hip replacement (THR) has not yet been
considered with reference to the cost implications to the National
Health Service. We obtained the number of cemented and uncemented components
implanted in 2009 from the National Joint Registry for England and
Wales. The cost of each component was established. The initial financial
saving if all were cemented was then calculated. Subsequently the
five-year rates of revision for each type of component were reviewed
and the predicted number of revisions at five years for the actual
components used was compared with the predicted number of revisions
for a cemented THR. This was then multiplied by the mean cost of
revision surgery to provide an indication of the savings over the
first five years if all primary THRs were cemented. The saving at primary THR was calculated to be £10 million with
an additional saving during the first five years of between £5 million
and £8.5 million. The use of cemented components in routine primary
THR in the NHS as a whole can be justified on a financial level
but we recognise individual patient factors must be considered when deciding
which components to use.
