This pilot study aimed to evaluate prospectively the use of inlet
radiographs of the hip as an alternative method of the assessment
of reduction after the surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia
of the hip (DDH). The children in this study underwent surgery between January
2013 and January 2015. All had inlet radiographs and CT scans post-operatively.
Data were analysed by determining inter-observer reliability and
intra-observer reproducibility, using the kappa value (K). Differences
were settled by discussion between the two observers until a consensus
was reached. The sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic
and CT results were compared. A total of 26 radiographs were obtained
from 23 children, with a mean age of 2.38 years (one to five).Aims
Patients and Methods
Assessment of skeletal age is important in children’s
orthopaedics. We compared two simplified methods used in the assessment
of skeletal age. Both methods have been described previously with
one based on the appearance of the epiphysis at the olecranon and
the other on the digital epiphyses. We also investigated the influence
of assessor experience on applying these two methods. Our investigation was based on the anteroposterior left hand
and lateral elbow radiographs of 44 boys (mean: 14.4; 12.4 to 16.1
) and 78 girls (mean: 13.0; 11.1 to14.9) obtained during the pubertal
growth spurt. A total of nine observers examined the radiographs
with the observers assigned to three groups based on their experience (experienced,
intermediate and novice). These raters were required to determined
skeletal ages twice at six-week intervals. The correlation between
the two methods was determined per assessment and per observer groups. Interclass
correlation coefficients (ICC) evaluated the reproducibility of
the two methods. The overall correlation between the two methods was r = 0.83
for boys and r = 0.84 for girls. The correlation was equal between
first and second assessment, and between the observer groups (r ≥ 0.82).
There was an equally strong ICC for the assessment effect (ICC ≤ 0.4%)
and observer effect (ICC ≤ 3%) for each method. There was no significant
(p <
0.05) difference between the levels of experience. The two methods are equally reliable in assessing skeletal maturity.
The olecranon method offers detailed information during the pubertal
growth spurt, while the digital method is as accurate but less detailed,
making it more useful after the pubertal growth spurt once the olecranon
has ossified. Cite this article:
The medial approach for the treatment of children
with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction
has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In
the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to
be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance
of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols,
primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis. Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the
medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach
(22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <
24 months at the
time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed
with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge
angle (CEA) were also measured. The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months
(3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24)
for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was
70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident
or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach
group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52).
The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to
10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There
was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between
the two groups. Children treated using an early medial approach did not have
a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up
than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates
of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols. Cite this article:
This study evaluated the results of a physeal-sparing technique of intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients, with particular reference to growth disturbance. Between 1992 and 2007, 57 children with a mean age of 12.2 years (6.8 to 14.5) underwent ACL reconstruction using the same technique. At a mean of 5.5 years (2 to 14) after surgery, 56 patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluation. At that time, 49 patients (87.5%) had reached bony maturity and 53 (95%) achieved A or B according to the IKDC 2000 classification. Four patients had stopped participation in sports because of knee symptoms, and three patients (5.4%) had a subsequent recurrent ACL injury. There was no clinical or radiological evidence of growth disturbance after a mean growth in stature of 20.0 cm (3 to 38). This study demonstrates that ACL reconstruction sparing the physes in children is a safe technique protecting against meniscal tears and giving better results than reconstruction in adults, without causing significant growth disturbance.
The practice of regular radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip is based on the widespread belief that primary acetabular dysplasia is a genetic disorder which can occur in the absence of frank subluxation or dislocation. We reviewed all infants who were involved in our screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip, between November 2002 and January 2004, and who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hip at six to eight weeks of age, but who, because of a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, had undergone further radiography after an interval of 6 to 12 months. The radiographs of 89 infants were analysed for signs of late dysplasia of the hip and assessed independently by three observers to allow for variability of measurement. There were 11 infants (11%) lost to follow-up. All the patients had normal radiographs at the final follow-up and none required any intervention. We therefore question the need for routine radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, but who are normal on clinical examination and assessment by ultrasound screening when six to eight weeks old.
The aetiology of congenital club foot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families and twins suggest a genetic component, the mode of inheritance does not comply with distinctive patterns. The Odense-based Danish Twin Registry contains data on all 73 000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 130 years. In 2002 all 46 418 twins born between 1931 and 1982 received a 17-page questionnaire, one question of which was ‘Were you born with club foot?’ A total of 94 twins answered ‘Yes’, giving an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital club foot of 0.0027 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0022 to 0.0034). We identified 55 complete twin pairs, representing 12 monozygotic, 22 dizygotic same sex (DZ. ss. ), 18 dizygotic other sex (DZ. os. ) and three unclassified. Two monozygotic and 2 DZ. ss. pairs were concordant. The pairwise
