The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the estimated lifetime risk of revision surgery after primary knee arthroplasty (KA). All patients from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project dataset undergoing primary KA during the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2019 were included. The cumulative incidence function for revision and death was calculated up to 20 years. Adjusted analyses used cause-specific Cox regression modelling to determine the influence of patient factors. The lifetime risk was calculated as a percentage for patients aged between 45 and 99 years using multiple-decrement life table methodology.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a higher risk of revision than total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly for younger patients. The outcome of knee arthroplasty is typically defined as implant survival or revision incidence after a defined number of years. This can be difficult for patients to conceptualize. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more meaningful estimate of risk projection over a patient’s remaining lifetime, and to compare this to TKA. Incidence of revision and mortality for all primary UKAs performed from 1999 to 2019 (n = 13,481) was obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Lifetime risk of revision was calculated for patients and stratified by age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade.Aims
Methods
Uncemented mobile bearing designs in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have seen an increase over the last decade. However, there are a lack of large-scale studies comparing survivorship of these specific designs to commonly used cemented mobile and fixed bearing designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of these designs. A total of 21,610 medial UKAs from 2007 to 2018 were selected from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare uncemented mobile bearings with cemented mobile and fixed bearings. Adjustments were made for patient and surgical factors, with their interactions being considered. Reasons and type of revision in the first two years after surgery were assessed.Aims
Methods
Aims. There is little information regarding the risk of a patient developing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when the patient has previously experienced PJI of a TKA or total hip arthroplasty (THA) in another joint. The goal of this study was to compare the risk of PJI of primary TKA in this patient population against matched controls. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 95 patients (102 primary TKAs) treated between 2000 and 2014 with a history of PJI in another TKA or THA. A total of 50 patients (53%) were female. Mean age was 69 years (45 to 88) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 36 kg/m. 2. (22 to 59). In total, 27% of patients were on chronic antibiotic suppression. Mean follow-up was six years (2 to 16). We 1:3 matched these (for age, sex, BMI, and surgical year) to 306 primary TKAs performed in 306 patients with a THA or TKA of another joint without a subsequent PJI.
A consecutive series of patients with a hydroxyapatite-coated
uncemented total knee replacement (TKR) performed by a single surgeon
between 1992 and 1995 was analysed. All patients were invited for
clinical review and radiological assessment. Revision for aseptic
loosening was the primary outcome. Assessment was based on the Knee
Society clinical score (KSS) and an independent radiological analysis.
Of 471 TKRs performed in 356 patients, 432 TKRs in 325 patients
were followed for a mean of 16.4 years (15 to 18). The 39 TKRs in
31 patients lost to follow-up had a mean KSS of 176 (148 to 198)
at a mean of ten years. There were revisions in 26 TKRs (5.5%),
of which 11 (2.3%) were for aseptic loosening. Other further surgery
was carried out on 49 TKRs (10.4%) including patellar resurfacing
in 20, arthrolysis in 19, manipulation under anaesthetic in nine
and extensor mechanism reconstruction in one. Survivorship at up to 18 years without aseptic loosening was
96% (95% confidence interval 91.9 to 98.1), at which point the mean
KSS was 176 (134 to 200). Of 110 knees that underwent radiological
evaluation, osteolysis was observed in five (4.5%), one of which
was revised. These data indicate that uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated TKR
can achieve favourable long-term survivorship, at least as good
as that of cemented designs.