To report the development of the technique for minimally invasive lumbar decompression using robotic-assisted navigation. Robotic planning software was used to map out bone removal for a laminar decompression after registration of CT scan images of one cadaveric specimen. A specialized acorn-shaped bone removal robotic drill was used to complete a robotic lumbar laminectomy. Post-procedure advanced imaging was obtained to compare actual bony decompression to the surgical plan. After confirming accuracy of the technique, a minimally invasive robotic-assisted laminectomy was performed on one 72-year-old female patient with lumbar spinal stenosis. Postoperative advanced imaging was obtained to confirm the decompression.Aims
Methods
Anchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques. Micro-finite element (µFE) models were created from micro-CT (μCT) scans of vertebrae implanted with two types of pedicle screws (L: Ennovate and R: S4). Simulations were conducted for a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) around each screw and for a full vertebra (FV) where different cementing scenarios were simulated around the screw tips. Stiffness was calculated in pull-out and anterior bending loads.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to determine whether
it would be feasible to use oblique lumbar interbody fixation for
patients with degenerative lumbar disease who required a fusion
but did not have a spondylolisthesis. A series of CT digital images from 60 patients with abdominal
disease were reconstructed in three dimensions (3D) using Mimics
v10.01: a digital cylinder was superimposed on the reconstructed
image to simulate the position of an interbody screw. The optimal
entry point of the screw and measurements of its trajectory were
recorded. Next, 26 cadaveric specimens were subjected to oblique
lumbar interbody fixation on the basis of the measurements derived
from the imaging studies. These were then compared with measurements
derived directly from the cadaveric vertebrae. Our study suggested that it is easy to insert the screws for
L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 fixation: there was no significant difference
in measurements between those of the 3-D digital images and the
cadaveric specimens. For L4/5 fixation, part of L5 inferior articular
process had to be removed to achieve the optimal trajectory of the
screw. For L5/S1 fixation, the screw heads were blocked by iliac
bone: consequently, the interior oblique angle of the cadaveric specimens
was less than that seen in the 3D digital images. We suggest that CT scans should be carried out pre-operatively
if this procedure is to be adopted in clinical practice. This will
assist in determining the feasibility of the procedure and will
provide accurate information to assist introduction of the screws. Cite this article:
