End caps are intended to prevent nail migration
(push-out) in elastic stable intramedullary nailing. The aim of
this study was to investigate the force at failure with and without
end caps, and whether different insertion angles of nails and end caps
would alter that force at failure. Simulated oblique fractures of the diaphysis were created in
15 artificial paediatric femurs. Titanium Elastic Nails with end
caps were inserted at angles of 45°, 55° and 65° in five specimens
for each angle to create three study groups. Biomechanical testing
was performed with axial compression until failure. An identical
fracture was created in four small adult cadaveric femurs harvested
from two donors (both female, aged 81 and 85 years, height 149 cm and
156 cm, respectively). All femurs were tested without and subsequently
with end caps inserted at 45°. In the artificial femurs, maximum force was not significantly
different between the three groups (p = 0.613). Push-out force was
significantly higher in the cadaveric specimens with the use of
end caps by an up to sixfold load increase (830 N, standard deviation
(SD) 280 These results indicate that the nail and end cap insertion angle
can be varied within 20° without altering construct stability and
that the risk of elastic stable intramedullary nailing push–out
can be effectively reduced by the use of end caps. Cite this article:
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN)
is generally acknowledged to be the treatment of choice for displaced diaphyseal
femoral fractures in children over the age of three years, although
complication rates of up to 50% are described. Pre-bending the nails
is recommended, but there are no published data to support this.
Using synthetic bones and a standardised simulated fracture, we
performed biomechanical testing to determine the influence on the
stability of the fracture of pre-bending the nails before implantation.
Standard ESIN was performed on 24 synthetic femoral models with
a spiral fracture. In eight cases the nails were inserted without
any pre-bending, in a further eight cases they were pre-bent to
30° and in the last group of eight cases they were pre-bent to 60°. Mechanical
testing revealed that pre-bending to 60° produced a significant
increase in the stiffness or stability of the fracture. Pre-bending
to 60° showed a significant positive influence on the stiffness
compared with unbent nails. Pre-bending to 30° improved stiffness
only slightly. These findings validate the recommendations for pre-bending,
but the degree of pre-bend should exceed 30°. Adopting higher degrees
of pre-bending should improve stability in spiral fractures and
reduce the complications of varus deformity and shortening.
