We used immediate post-operative The bending angles in the sagittal and axial planes were significantly
greater but the coronal-bending angle was significantly less in
the transtibial group than in the anteromedial portal and outside-in
groups (p <
0.001 each). The mean length of the femoral tunnel
in all three planes was significantly greater in the transtibial
group than the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (p <
0.001 each), but all mean tunnel lengths in the three groups exceeded
30 mm. The only significant difference was the coronal graft- bending
angle in the anteromedial portal and outside-in groups (23.5° Compared with the transtibial technique, the anteromedial portal
and outside-in techniques may reduce the graft-bending stress at
the opening of the femoral tunnel. Despite the femoral tunnel length
being shorter in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques
than in the transtibial technique, a femoral tunnel length of more than
30 mm in the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques may be
sufficient for the graft to heal. Cite this article:
This study validates the short-form WOMAC function scale for assessment of conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Data were collected before treatment and six and nine months later, from 100 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee to determine the validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and responsiveness of the short-form WOMAC function scale. The scale showed high correlation with the traditional WOMAC and other measures. The internal consistency was good (Cronbach α: 0.88 to 0.95) and an excellent test-retest reliability was found (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (ρc): 0.85 to 0.94). The responsiveness was adequate and comparable to that of the traditional WOMAC (standardised response mean 0.56 to 0.44 and effect size 0.64 to 0.57) and appeared not to be significantly affected by floor or ceiling effects (0% and 7%, respectively). The short-form WOMAC function scale is a valid, reliable and responsive alternative to the traditional WOMAC in the evaluation of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee managed conservatively. It is simple to use in daily practice and is therefore less of a burden for patients in clinical trials.