In a rabbit model we investigated the efficacy of a silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite (SF/HA) composite on the repair of a segmental bone defect. Four types of porous SF/HA composites (SF/HA-1, SF/HA-2, SF/HA-3, SF/HA-4) with different material ratios, pore sizes, porosity and additives were implanted subcutaneously into Sprague-Dawley rats to observe biodegradation. SF/HA-3, which had characteristics more suitable for a bone substitite based on strength and resorption was selected as a scaffold and co-cultured with rabbit bone-marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). A segmental bone defect was created in the rabbit radius. The animals were randomised into group 1 (SF/HA-3 combined with BMSCs implanted into the bone defect), group 2 (SF/HA implanted alone) and group 3 (nothing implanted). They were killed at four, eight and 12 weeks for visual, radiological and histological study.

The bone defects had complete union for group 1 and partial union in group 2, 12 weeks after operation. There was no formation of new bone in group 3. We conclude that SF/HA-3 combined with BMSCs supports bone healing and offers potential as a bone-graft substitute.

We used fresh small-fragment osteochondral allografts to reconstruct post-traumatic osteochondral defects in 126 knees of 123 patients with a mean age of 35 years. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (2 to 20), 108 knees were rated as successful (85%) and 18 had failed (15%).

The factors related to failure included age over 50 years (p = 0.008), bipolar defects (p < 0.05), malaligned knees with overstressing of the grafts, and workers’ compensation cases (p < 0.04). Collapse of the graft by more than 3 mm and of the joint space of more than 50% were seen more frequently in radiographs of failed grafts.

Our encouraging clinical results for fresh small-fragment osteochondral allografts show that they are indicated for unipolar post-traumatic osteochondral defects of the knee in young active patients.

We analysed the bacterial contamination of 1999 bone allografts retrieved from 200 cadaver donors under sterile operating conditions. The effect of various factors on the relative risk of contamination was estimated using a multiple logistic regression model.

Organisms of low pathogenicity were cultured from 50% of the grafts and of high pathogenicity from 3%. The risk of contamination with low pathogenic organisms (mainly skin commensals) increased by a factor of 1.6 for each member added to the procurement team. The risk of contamination with high pathogenic organisms (mainly contaminants from the gastrointestinal tract) was 3.4 times higher in donors with a traumatic cause of death and 5.2 times higher in those with a positive blood culture. Preceding organ procurement did not significantly influence the risk of contamination. Rinsing the graft with an antibiotic solution was not an effective decontamination method.

The major source of contamination is exogenous and is strongly influenced by the procurement team. Contamination from endogenous sources can be controlled by donor selection. We discuss methods that can be used to decrease contamination and the rate of discarding of bone allografts.

Two acetabula which contained large bone allografts introduced at revision arthroplasty were obtained at post-mortem. The allografts had been placed in superior defects to support cementless acetabular components, and both hips were functioning well at the time of death. Clinical radiographs demonstrated apparent healing of graft to host bone, no graft collapse and stability of the acetabular components. Microscopic examination of sections through these specimens showed that the bulk allografts were encapsulated in fibrous tissue. Vascularity was increased at the host-graft interface, but there was limited evidence of bone union between the graft and the host. In the few areas where union had occurred, revascularisation extended no more than 2 mm beyond the graft-host interface.

Within the body of the graft, the acellular matrix of trabecular bone maintained structural integrity up to 48 months after surgery. In areas where the allograft was adjacent to an implant, there was fibrous tissue orientated parallel to the implant surface. The acetabulum which contained a porous-coated component showed evidence of bone growth into the porous surface where it was in contact with viable host bone. No ingrowth occurred in areas where the porous coating was in contact with the graft. Although the grafts were functioning well, allograft revascularisation and remodelling were minimal, and the radiological appearance of healing did not correlate with histological findings.

We performed biopsies during reoperation for minor complications in two active young patients 9 and 19 months after massive bone allograft implantation for bone tumour. The grafts were dead and resorption-apposition activity, when present, was predominantly in subperiosteal areas. Inflammatory infiltration was very seldom found.

Features considered as ‘microfractures’ or ‘microcracks’ were noted in the cortical ring together with the formation of woven bone, in areas with remodelling. Such cracks are likely to be of mechanical origin and do not inevitably lead to complications.