Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 1 | Pages 10 - 14
1 Feb 2020
Ibrahim M Reito A Pidgaiska O


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 2 | Pages 322 - 326
1 Mar 1997
Katz RP Callaghan JJ Sullivan PM Johnston RC

We performed 83 consecutive cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients between 1977 and 1983 using improved cementing techniques. One patient (two hips) was lost to follow-up. The remaining 76 patients (81 hips) had an average age at revision of 63.7 years (23 to 89). At the final follow-up 18 hips (22%) had had a reoperation, two (2.5%) for sepsis, three (4%) for dislocation and 13 (16%) for aseptic loosening. The incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 5.4% and for aseptic acetabular loosening 16%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision is a durable option in revision hip surgery when improved cementing techniques are used, but that cemented acetabular revision is unsatisfactory