Occult (clinical) injuries represent 15% of all scaphoid fractures, posing significant challenges to the clinician. MRI has been suggested as the gold standard for diagnosis, but remains expensive, time-consuming, and is in high demand. Conventional management with immobilization and serial radiography typically results in multiple follow-up attendances to clinic, radiation exposure, and delays return to work. Suboptimal management can result in significant disability and, frequently, litigation. We present a service evaluation report following the introduction of a quality-improvement themed, streamlined, clinical scaphoid pathway. Patients are offered a removable wrist splint with verbal and written instructions to remove it two weeks following injury, for self-assessment. The persistence of pain is the patient’s guide to ‘opt-in’ and to self-refer for a follow-up appointment with a senior emergency physician. On confirmation of ongoing signs of clinical scaphoid injury, an urgent outpatient ‘fast’-wrist protocol MRI scan is ordered, with instructions to maintain wrist immobilization. Patients with positive scan results are referred for specialist orthopaedic assessment via a virtual fracture clinic.Aims
Methods
The aim of the Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma (SMaRT) trial was to evaluate the clinical and cost implications of using immediate MRI in the acute management of patients with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid with negative radiographs. Patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid and negative radiographs were randomized to a control group, who did not undergo further imaging in the ED, or an intervention group, who had an MRI of the wrist as an additional test during the initial ED attendance. Most participants were male (52% control, 61% intervention), with a mean age of 36.2 years (18 to 73) in the control group and 38.2 years (20 to 71) in the intervention group. The primary outcome was total cost impact at three months post-recruitment. Secondary outcomes included total costs at six months, the assessment of clinical findings, diagnostic accuracy, and the participants’ self-reported level of satisfaction. Differences in cost were estimated using generalized linear models with gamma errors.Aims
Patients and Methods
A prospective study was performed to develop
a clinical prediction rule that incorporated demographic and clinical factors
predictive of a fracture of the scaphoid. Of 260 consecutive patients
with a clinically suspected or radiologically confirmed scaphoid
fracture, 223 returned for evaluation two weeks after injury and
formed the basis of our analysis. Patients were evaluated within
72 hours of injury and at approximately two and six weeks after injury
using clinical assessment and standard radiographs. Demographic
data and the results of seven specific tests in the clinical examination
were recorded. There were 116 (52%) men and their mean age was 33 years (13
to 95; Our study has demonstrated that clinical prediction rules have
a considerable influence on the probability of a suspected scaphoid
fracture. This will help improve the use of supplementary investigations
where the diagnosis remains in doubt.
We have assessed the value of using a simple apparatus, the Carpal Box, in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture, to produce elongated and magnified radiographs of the carpus. The interobserver agreement between 60 observers of standard scaphoid radiographs and longitudinal and transverse Carpal Box radiographs (X-CB) was compared in 11 patients. Three-phase bone scanning was used as a comparative standard. If at least 75% of the observers agreed and the result was confirmed by three-phase bone scanning, the outcome was termed reliable. Scaphoid radiographs and the longitudinal X-CB films were reliable in four patients and the transverse X-CB films in six patients. The bone scan suggested a scaphoid fracture in five of the 11 patients. Agreement in the interpretation of the standard scaphoid radiographs was acceptable in only 36% of patients: in interpretation of transverse Carpal Box radiographs this figure increased to 55%.
Twenty observers reported independently on the presence or absence of a fracture of the scaphoid on 60 sets of radiographs; these included initial and 2- to 3-week views in patients in whom the outcome was known, normal scaphoids and random copies of these. Analysis of variance of the accuracy of observations revealed that the 2- to 3-week radiographs did not improve diagnostic ability and that this was independent of the experience or seniority of the observer. For normal radiographs, 20% of the observations reported a fracture. Reproducibility of opinion improved with experience but this did not help with accuracy. Radiographs without accurate clinical observation should not determine the management of the suspected scaphoid fracture.
