Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), defined by an age at presentation of 11 to 18 years, has a prevalence of 0.47% and accounts for approximately 90% of all cases of idiopathic scoliosis. Despite decades of research, the exact aetiology of AIS remains unknown. It is becoming evident that it is the result of a complex interplay of genetic, internal, and environmental factors. It has been hypothesized that genetic variants act as the initial trigger that allow epigenetic factors to propagate AIS, which could also explain the wide phenotypic variation in the presentation of the disorder. A better understanding of the underlying aetiological mechanisms could help to establish the diagnosis earlier and allow a more accurate prediction of deformity progression. This, in turn, would prompt imaging and therapeutic intervention at the appropriate time, thereby achieving the best clinical outcome for this group of patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):915–921.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs).

Aims. The outcome following the development of neurological complications after corrective surgery for scoliosis varies from full recovery to a permanent deficit. This study aimed to assess the prognosis and recovery of major neurological deficits in these patients, and to determine the risk factors for non-recovery, at a minimum follow-up of two years. Methods. A major neurological deficit was identified in 65 of 8,870 patients who underwent corrective surgery for scoliosis, including eight with complete paraplegia and 57 with incomplete paraplegia. There were 23 male and 42 female patients. Their mean age was 25.0 years (SD 16.3). The aetiology of the scoliosis was idiopathic (n = 6), congenital (n = 23), neuromuscular (n = 11), neurofibromatosis type 1 (n = 6), and others (n = 19). Neurological function was determined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale at a mean follow-up of 45.4 months (SD 17.2). the patients were divided into those with recovery and those with no recovery according to the ASIA scale during follow-up. Results. The incidence of major deficit was 0.73%. At six-month follow-up, 39 patients (60%) had complete recovery and ten (15.4%) had incomplete recovery; these percentages improved to 70.8% (46) and 16.9% (11) at follow-up of two years, respectively. Eight patients showed no recovery at the final follow-up. The cause of injury was mechanical in 39 patients and ischaemic in five. For 11 patients with misplaced implants and haematoma formation, nine had complete recovery. Fisher’s exact test showed a significant difference in the aetiology of the scoliosis (p = 0.007) and preoperative deficit (p = 0.016) between the recovery and non-recovery groups. A preoperative deficit was found to be significantly associated with non-recovery (odds ratio 8.5 (95% confidence interval 1.676 to 43.109); p = 0.010) in a multivariate regression model. Conclusion. For patients with scoliosis who develop a major neurological deficit after corrective surgery, recovery (complete and incomplete) can be expected in 87.7%. The first three to six months is the time window for recovery. In patients with misplaced implants and haematoma formation, the prognosis is satisfactory with appropriate early intervention. Patients with a preoperative neurological deficit are at a significant risk of having a permanent deficit. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):103–111

Aims

To report the outcome of spinal deformity correction through anterior spinal fusion in wheelchair-bound patients with myelomeningocele.

Aims

Severe spinal deformity in growing patients often requires surgical management. We describe the incidence of spinal deformity surgery in a National Health Service.

Aims

The aim of this study was a quantitative analysis of a surgeon’s learning curve for scoliosis surgery and the relationship between the surgeon’s experience and post-operative outcomes, which has not been previously well described.

A self-control ratio, the spine-pelvis index (SPI), was proposed for the assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in this study. The aim was to evaluate the disproportionate growth between the spine and pelvis in these patients using SPI. A total of 64 female patients with thoracic AIS were randomly enrolled between December 2010 and October 2012 (mean age 13 years, standard deviation (sd) 2.17; 9 to 18) and a further 73 healthy female patients with a mean age of 12.4 years (mean age 12.4 years, sd 2.24; 9 to 18), were randomly selected from a normal control database at our centre. The radiographic parameters measured included length of spine (LOS), height of spine (HOS), length of thoracic vertebrae (LOT), height of thoracic vertebrae (HOT), width of pelvis (WOP), height of pelvis (HOP) and width of thorax (WOT). SPI was defined as the ratio LOS/HOP. The SPI and LOT/HOP in patients with AIS showed a significant increase when compared with normal girls (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively), implying an abnormal pattern of growth of the spine relative to the pelvis in patients with AIS.

No significant difference in SPI was found in different age groups in the control group, making the SPI an age-independent parameter with a mean value of 2.219 (2.164 to 2.239). We also found that the SPI was not related to maturity in the control group.

This study, for the first time, used a self-control ratio to confirm the disproportionate patterns of growth of the spine and pelvis in patients with thoracic AIS, highlighting that the SPI is not affected by age or maturity.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1668–74.

The management of spinal deformity in children with univentricular cardiac pathology poses significant challenges to the surgical and anaesthetic teams. To date, only posterior instrumented fusion techniques have been used in these children and these are associated with a high rate of complications. We reviewed our experience of both growing rod instrumentation and posterior instrumented fusion in children with a univentricular circulation.

Six children underwent spinal corrective surgery, two with cavopulmonary shunts and four following completion of a Fontan procedure. Three underwent growing rod instrumentation, two had a posterior fusion and one had spinal growth arrest. There were no complications following surgery, and the children undergoing growing rod instrumentation were successfully lengthened. We noted a trend for greater blood loss and haemodynamic instability in those whose surgery was undertaken following completion of a Fontan procedure. At a median follow-up of 87.6 months (interquartile range (IQR) 62.9 to 96.5) the median correction of deformity was 24.2% (64.5° (IQR 46° to 80°) vs 50.5° (IQR 36° to 63°)).

We believe that early surgical intervention with growing rod instrumentation systems allows staged correction of the spinal deformity and reduces the haemodynamic insult to these physiologically compromised children. Due to the haemodynamic changes that occur with the completed Fontan circulation, the initial scoliosis surgery should ideally be undertaken when in the cavopulmonary shunt stage.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:94–9.

We report the results of vertebral column resection (VCR) for paediatric patients with spinal deformity. A total of 49 VCRs in paediatric patients from four university hospitals between 2005 and 2009 with a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively identified. After excluding single hemivertebral resections (n = 25) and VCRs performed for patients with myelomeningocele (n = 6), as well as spondylectomies performed for tumour (n = 4), there were 14 patients who had undergone full VCR at a mean age of 12.3 years (6.5 to 17.9). The aetiology was congenital scoliosis in five, neuromuscular scoliosis in three, congenital kyphosis in two, global kyphosis in two, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in one and secondary scoliosis in one. A total of seven anteroposterior and seven posterolateral approaches were used. The mean major curve deformity was 86° (67° to 120°) pre-operatively and 37° (17° to 80°) at the two-year follow-up; correction was a mean of 54% (18% to 86%) in the anteroposterior and 60% (41% to 70%) in the posterolateral group at the two-year follow-up (p = 0.53). The mean Scoliosis Research Society-24 total scores were 100 (92 to 108) for the anteroposterior and 102 (95 to 105) for the posterolateral group. There was one paraparesis in the anteroposterior group necessitating urgent re-decompression, with a full recovery. Patients undergoing VCR are highly satisfied after a successful procedure

A review of the current literature shows that there is a lack of consensus regarding the treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Most of the views and recommendations provided in various reports are weakly supported by evidence. There is a limited amount of information about the natural history of the condition, making it difficult to compare the effectiveness of various conservative and operative treatments. This systematic review summarises the current knowledge on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and attempts to present a rational approach to the evaluation and management of this condition in children and adolescents.

At the apex of an idiopathic scoliotic curve there is a greater proportion of "slow twitch" muscle fibres in multifidus on the convex as compared to the concave side. To determine whether this represents a primary muscular imbalance relevant to the aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis or merely a secondary change, the lengths of multifidus on opposite sides of the curve were measured. Multifidus is shorter on the convex side. This is consistent with the theory of primary muscular imbalance, in which the more tonically acting muscle with its higher proportion of "slow twitch" fibres contracts and shortens as the deformity is produced. The paradox of multifidus being shorter on the convex rather than on the concave side is explained by consideration of its action.

1. Eleven patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, most of them young adults at a terminal stage, were found to have structural scoliosis with curves measuring between 20 and 80 degrees. 2. The common feature was severe and protracted rheumatoid disease. 3. The characteristics of the spinal curves are analysed; the longer curves may have been caused by muscle imbalance and the shorter curves possibly by asymmetrical involvement of the inter-apophyseal joints. 4. It is suggested that juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is an unusual etiological factor of scoliosis

The etiological factors concerned in paralytic scoliosis are complex. Four main types of paralytic scoliosis can be recognised. 1. The general C-curve due to the body's anatomical attempt to shift its centre of gravity towards the weaker side. Vertebral rotation is not usually marked. This type usually occurs when patients with relatively slight paralysis have been allowed up too early ; it does not usually progress to severe deformity but may occasionally do so, gradually changing into Type 2. This type usually responds well to a period of rest and muscle redevelopment in recumbency. It also responds favourably to correction and fusion because correction is easy and there is little tendency to deterioration. Many of the "successes" of correction and fusion are in this class—almost equal success would often have been gained without "correction." The spine is slightly, but not very, unstable and a relatively localised fusion will give the little extra support that is needed. 2. The "general collapse" type of curve due to extensive spinal weakness. This is the type in which simple head suspension produces marked correction. Rotation is moderate. Provided the patient's general condition is satisfactory extensive spinal fusion is usually the best treatment and produces gratifying improvement. 3. The primary lumbar curve due to a combination of pelvic obliquity, extraspinal imbalance and imbalance of the deep rotator muscles. Rotation is usually marked. Treatment must include the correction of all these factors. In mild cases correction of the pelvic obliquity is enough, but in marked cases the spine must also be corrected. The disability from a lumbar paralytic scoliosis is much greater than that from a lumbar idiopathic scoliosis of the same degree; so correction is necessary in this type. Correction in a Risser-type jacket is often inadequate and recourse to operative correction is usually required. 4. The primary thoracic curve—often associated with weakness of the scapular muscles. The indications for and methods of treatment are practically the same as in primary idiopathic thoracic curves. These curves tend to be progressive and uncompensated. Although the most popular treatment is correction and fusion, wedge osteotomy of the spine gives better correction in intractable cases. The main need is for further investigation into the etiology of paralytic scoliosis so that adequate preventive measures may be undertaken at an early stage. It is essential that every child who contracts poliomyelitis should have his back muscles examined before he gets up. If there is any suggestion of scoliosis further investigations including radiography and electromyography are essential

1. Five cases of scoliosis with paraplegia are reported, and thirty-six comparable cases from the literature are reviewed. These forty-one cases have been studied with the object of determining the etiology of scoliosis, the reason why cord compression sometimes develops, and the results of conservative and operative treatment of such compression of the cord. 2. The cause of paraplegia is nearly always compression of the spinal cord by the dura, which, in severe scoliosis, is under longitudinal tension because of its firm attachment to the foramen magnum above and the sacrum below. Such tension, resisting displacement of the spinal cord from the straight line, may be shown to cause incomplete spinal block even when there is no paralysis. 3. When paralysis occurs it usually develops during the years of most rapid growth, the tight dura being unable to accommodate itself to the rate of growth of the spinal column; cord compression is probably increased by narrowing of the dural sac by rotational displacement. 4. The most striking results have been secured by laminectomy with section of the dura and sometimes division of dentate ligaments and tight nerve roots. After such division there is evidence of release of compression: the cord herniates through the dural slit; and spinal pulsation returns. 5. It is important to control bleeding in order to avoid post-operative compression by blood clot; and to prevent leakage of cerebro-spinal fluid through the arachnoid. 6. It is unwise to perform spinal fusion at the same time as decompression because it increases the danger of haematoma formation. Moreover the improvement gained by decompression is maintained even if no fusion of the spine is performed. 7. Conservative treatment of scoliosis with paraplegia should not be continued for long periods unless there is evidence of early and progressive improvement because prolonged compression causes irreversible changes in the cord. 8. In three cases, paraplegia was not due to dural compression: one turned out later to be a case of syringomyelia; one, reported by Heyman, was due to the pressure of a bone spur; and one, reported in this series, was due to a congenital tight band of developmental origin which might have caused the scoliosis as well as the paralysis, and in which, after resection of the band, recovery from the paralysis was complete