Cortical and cancellous bone healing processes appear to be histologically different. They also respond differently to anti-inflammatory agents. We investigated whether the leucocyte composition on days 3 and 5 after cortical and cancellous injuries to bone was different, and compared changes over time using day 3 as the baseline. Ten-week-old male C56/Bl6J mice were randomized to either cancellous injury in the proximal tibia or cortical injury in the femoral diaphysis. Regenerating tissues were analyzed with flow cytometry at days 3 and 5, using panels with 15 antibodies for common macrophage and lymphocyte markers. The cellular response from day 3 to 5 was compared in order to identify differences in how cancellous and cortical bone healing develop.Objectives
Methods
Healing in cancellous metaphyseal bone might be different from
midshaft fracture healing due to different access to mesenchymal
stem cells, and because metaphyseal bone often heals without a cartilaginous
phase. Inflammation plays an important role in the healing of a
shaft fracture, but if metaphyseal injury is different, it is important
to clarify if the role of inflammation is also different. The biology
of fracture healing is also influenced by the degree of mechanical
stability. It is unclear if inflammation interacts with stability-related
factors. We investigated the role of inflammation in three different models:
a metaphyseal screw pull-out, a shaft fracture with unstable nailing
(IM-nail) and a stable external fixation (ExFix) model. For each,
half of the animals received dexamethasone to reduce inflammation,
and half received control injections. Mechanical and morphometric evaluation
was used.Objectives
Methods
