Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. Controversy exists regarding
the optimal treatment for independent patients with displaced intracapsular fractures
of the proximal femur. The recognised alternatives are hemiarthroplasty
and total hip replacement. At present there is no established standard
of care, with both types of arthroplasty being used in many centres.
The principal advantages of total hip replacement are a functional
benefit over hemiarthroplasty and a reduced risk of revision surgery.
The principal criticism is the increased risk of dislocation. We
believe that an alternative acetabular component may reduce the
risk of dislocation but still provide the functional benefit of
total hip replacement in these patients. We therefore propose to
investigate the dislocation risk of a dual-mobility acetabular component
compared with standard polyethylene component in
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. The National Hip Fracture
Audit currently provides a framework for service evaluation. This
evaluation is based upon the assessment of process rather than assessment
of patient-centred outcome and therefore it fails to provide meaningful
data regarding the clinical effectiveness of treatments. This study
aims to capture data from the cohort of patients who present with
a fracture of the proximal femur at a single United Kingdom Major
Trauma Centre. Patient-centred outcomes will be recorded and provide
a baseline cohort within which to test the clinical effectiveness
of experimental interventions.
