Periprosthetic hip fractures (PPFs) after total hip arthroplasty are difficult to treat. Therefore, it is important to identify modifiable risk factors such as stem selection to reduce the occurrence of PPFs. This study aimed to clarify differences in fracture torque, surface strain, and fracture type analysis between three different types of cemented stems. We conducted biomechanical testing of bone analogues using six cemented stems of three different types: collarless polished tapered (CPT) stem, Versys Advocate (Versys) stem, and Charnley-Marcel-Kerboull (CMK) stem. Experienced surgeons implanted each of these types of stems into six bone analogues, and the analogues were compressed and internally rotated until failure. Torque to fracture and fracture type were recorded. We also measured surface strain distribution using triaxial rosettes.Aims
Methods
Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing was introduced into clinical
practice because it was perceived to be a better alternative to
conventional total hip replacement for young and active patients.
However, an increasing number of reports of complications have arisen
focusing on design and orientation of the components, the generation
of metallic wear particles and serum levels of metallic ions. The
procedure introduced a combination of two elements: large-dimension
components and hard abrasive particles of metal wear. The objective
of our study was to investigate the theory that microseparation
of the articular surfaces draws in a high volume of bursal fluid
and its contents into the articulation, and at relocation under
load would generate high pressures of fluid ejection, resulting
in an abrasive water jet. This theoretical concept using MoM resurfacing components (head
diameter 55 mm) was modelled mathematically and confirmed experimentally
using a material-testing machine that pushed the head into the cup
at a rate of 1000 mm/min until fully engaged.Objectives
Methods
