Current studies on the additional benefit of using computed tomography
(CT) in order to evaluate the surgeons’ agreement on treatment plans
for fracture are inconsistent. This inconsistency can be explained
by a methodological phenomenon called ‘spectrum bias’, defined as
the bias inherent when investigators choose a population lacking
therapeutic uncertainty for evaluation. The aim of the study is
to determine the influence of spectrum bias on the intra-observer
agreement of treatment plans for fractures of the distal radius. Four surgeons evaluated 51 patients with displaced fractures
of the distal radius at four time points: T1 and T2: conventional
radiographs; T3 and T4: radiographs and additional CT scan (radiograph
and CT). Choice of treatment plan (operative or non-operative) and
therapeutic certainty (five-point scale: very uncertain to very
certain) were rated. To determine the influence of spectrum bias,
the intra-observer agreement was analysed, using Kappa statistics,
for each degree of therapeutic certainty. Objectives
Methods
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. The National Hip Fracture
Audit currently provides a framework for service evaluation. This
evaluation is based upon the assessment of process rather than assessment
of patient-centred outcome and therefore it fails to provide meaningful
data regarding the clinical effectiveness of treatments. This study
aims to capture data from the cohort of patients who present with
a fracture of the proximal femur at a single United Kingdom Major
Trauma Centre. Patient-centred outcomes will be recorded and provide
a baseline cohort within which to test the clinical effectiveness
of experimental interventions.
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. Controversy exists regarding
the optimal treatment for patients with unstable trochanteric proximal
femoral fractures. The recognised treatment alternatives are extramedullary
fixation usually with a sliding hip screw and intramedullary fixation
with a cephalomedullary nail. Current evidence suggests that best
results and lowest complication rates occur using a sliding hip screw.
Complications in these difficult fractures are relatively common
regardless of type of treatment. We believe that a novel device,
the X-Bolt dynamic plating system, may offer superior fixation over
a sliding hip screw with lower reoperation risk and better function.
We therefore propose to investigate the clinical effectiveness of
the X-bolt dynamic plating system compared with standard sliding
hip screw fixation within the framework of a the larger WHiTE (Warwick
Hip Trauma Evaluation) Comprehensive Cohort Study. Cite this article:
