To identify the responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal clinical important change (MIC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) (v2) for each of the eight dimensions and the total score following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 3,321 patients undergoing primary TKA with preoperative and one-year postoperative SF-36 scores. At one-year patients were asked how satisfied they were and “How much did the knee arthroplasty surgery improve the quality of your life?”, which was graded as: great, moderate, little (n = 277), none (n = 98), or worse.Aims
Methods
A lack of connection between surgeons and patients in evaluating
the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to the search
for the ideal patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate
these procedures. We hypothesised that the desired psychometric properties
of the ideal outcome tool have not been uniformly addressed in studies describing
TKA PROMS. A systematic review was conducted investigating one or more facets
of patient-reported scores for measuring primary TKA outcome. Studies
were analysed by study design, subject demographics, surgical technique,
and follow-up adequacy, with the ‘gold standard’ of psychometric
properties being systematic development, validity, reliability,
and responsiveness.Objectives
Methods
