Aims. To evaluate how fore- and midfoot coronal plane alignment differs in feet with hallux valgus (HV), using 3DCT when measured in standard weightbearing (SWB) versus sesamoid view (SV) position, and to determine whether first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) dorsiflexion affects the relationship between the first metatarsal (M1) head and the sesamoid bones. Methods. A consecutive series of 34 feet that underwent 3DCT in SWB and SV positions for symptomatic HV was assessed, of which four feet were excluded for distorted or incomplete images. Two foot and ankle clinicians independently digitized a series of points, and measured a series of angles according to a pre-defined protocol. Measurements include navicular pronation angle, M1 head (Saltzman angle), and metatarsosesamoid rotation angle (MSRA). Results. The mean age of the 30 patients was 57.5 years (SD 13.4). The mean navicular pronation angle was significantly smaller in the SV position (9.6° (SD 4.4°)) compared to the SWB position (16.4° (SD 5.8°); p < 0.001). There was a difference in MSRA between the SWB and SV positions, revealing an increase in MSRA in 22 patients, while there was a decrease in eight patients. In patients where the MSRA increased, the mean Saltzman angle was 2.5° (SD 5.7°) lower in the SV position versus the SWB position, while in patients where MSRA decreased, the mean Saltzman angle was 3.4° (SD 3.6°) greater in the SV position versus the SWB position. Conclusion. MTP dorsiflexion causes supination of the navicular, while other first ray parameters remain unchanged, and has a greater influence on the M1 head coronal alignment than on the sesamoids. MTP dorsiflexion induces axial rotations of M1, which vary in direction and magnitude from one patient to another. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2025;14(2):69–76

Introduction. The aetiology of hallux valgus is almost certainly multifactoral. The biomechanics of the first ray is a common factor to most. There is very little literature examining the anatomy of the proximal metatarsal articular surface and its relationship to hallux valgus deformity. Methods. We examined 42 feet from 23 specimens in this anatomical dissection study. Results. This analysis revealed three distinct articular subtypes. Type 1 had one single facet, type 2 had two distinct articular facets, and type 3 had three articular facets one of which was a lateral inferior facet elevated from the first. Type 1 joints occurred exclusively in the hallux valgus specimens, while type 3 joints occurred exclusively in normal specimens. Type 2 joints occurred in both hallux valgus and normal specimens. Another consistent finding in regards to the proximal articular surface of the first metatarsal was the lateral plantar prominence. This prominence possessed its own articular surface in type 3 joints and was significantly flatter in specimens with hallux valgus (p < 0.001) and the angle with the joint was significantly more obtuse (p < 0.001). Conclusions. We believe the size and acute angle of this prominence gives structural mechanical impedance to movement at the tarsometatarsal joint and thus improves the stability