Aims. Nonoperative treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) typically involves numerous in-person clinic visits, which can place a significant burden on healthcare services and patients’ families. We therefore aimed to establish and validate a pilot hybrid-virtual clinic to evaluate the clinical outcomes with the delivery of a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol for infant DDH to streamline care and minimize in-person visits. Methods. This was a prospective, single-centre, quality improvement (QI) study of infants with DDH who underwent a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol in a unified multidisciplinary infant hip clinic from December 2022 to October 2023. Practice changes were made to our published nonoperative treatment protocol, where specific in-person follow-up visits were replaced with virtual appointments, and a dedicated institutional infant hip clinic email was created for caregiver inquiries. Results. Of all interim follow-up visits, 53% (77/144) occurred virtually; 94% (48/51) of infants successfully completed brace treatment. No failures of treatment occurred during the virtual follow-up period. In total, 8% (4/51) of infants experienced brace-related complications, including only one during the virtual phase; 10% (5/51) of infants made unplanned visits to the hip clinic, including two infants who attended for brace check and adjustments during the virtual phase. One unplanned ultrasound examination occurred during the virtual phase upon request of a caregiver, which did not alter the course of treatment. No infants required bracing for an extended time due to virtual visits. Overall, 92% (47/51) of caregivers reported awareness of the hip clinic email and 33% (17/51) used this resource. No urgent inquiries were received during the virtual phase. Conclusion. Our hybrid-virtual infant hip clinic has shown comparable outcomes to the historic norms of our in-person infant hip clinic. This model of care can improve the efficiency of standardized DDH treatment protocols while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(3):321–327

Aims. The management of fractures of the medial epicondyle is one of the greatest controversies in paediatric fracture care, with uncertainty concerning the need for surgery. The British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery prioritized this as their most important research question in paediatric trauma. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled, multicentre, prospective superiority trial of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced medial epicondyle fractures: the Surgery or Cast of the EpicoNdyle in Children’s Elbows (SCIENCE) trial. Methods. Children aged seven to 15 years old inclusive, who have sustained a displaced fracture of the medial epicondyle, are eligible to take part. Baseline function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb score, pain measured using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for younger patients (EQ-5D-Y) will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified using a minimization algorithm by centre and initial elbow dislocation status (i.e. dislocated or not-dislocated at presentation to the emergency department)) to either a regimen of the operative fixation or non-surgical treatment. Outcomes. At six weeks, and three, six, and 12 months, data on function, pain, sports/music participation, QoL, immobilization, and analgesia will be collected. These will also be repeated annually until the child reaches the age of 16 years. Four weeks after injury, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the PROMIS upper limb score at 12 months post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardians. The NHS number of participants will be stored to enable future data linkage to sources of routinely collected data (i.e. Hospital Episode Statistics). Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(1):69–77

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ experience of a paediatric randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgical reduction with non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore parents’ experience of their child’s recovery, and their thoughts about their decision to enrol their child in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of surgery versus non-surgical casting for a displaced distal radius fracture.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore parents and young people’s experience of having a medial epicondyle fracture, and their thoughts about the uncertainty regarding the optimal treatment.