We performed 88 primary ball-and-socket arthroplasties of the trapeziometacarpal joint in 84 patients (69 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 61 years (37 to 81). Cemented de la Caffinière prostheses were implanted in 43 joints from 1988 to 1991 and 45 cementless Ledoux implants were used between 1992 and 1994. Of the 61 surviving prostheses still in situ, 51 were reviewed clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up of 25 months for the Ledoux and 63 months for the de la Caffinière implant.

The survival rate for the Ledoux prosthesis was 58.9% at 16 months and for the de la Caffinière implant 66.4% at 68 months. Loosening occurred in 15% of the Ledoux stems, in 46% of the Ledoux cups, in 24% of the de la Caffinière stems and in 28% of the de la Caffinière cups.

Both prostheses behaved similarly, and it is clear that a constrained ball-and-socket prosthesis is not suitable for the trapeziometacarpal joint.

We treated 43 patients (38 women and 5 men) with osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb by non-cemented arthroplasty of the first carpometacarpal joint as described by Ledoux. The probability of a patient avoiding revision for 12 months was 62% and for 16 months 59%. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 83% and luxation in 17%.

The surviving prostheses were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 25.3 months. Pain on loading, movement or at rest was seen in 75% of the patients. There was significant reduction in the range of movement of the trapeziometacarpal joint and of wrist strength. Radiological assessment showed significant subsidence of the stem in the first metacarpal and migration of the cup, with the stem loose in 15% and the cup in 46%.

We no longer recommend this method of joint replacement.