Fractures of the forearm (radius or ulna or both)
in children have traditionally been immobilised in plaster of Paris (POP)
but synthetic cast materials are becoming more popular. There have
been no randomised studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials.
The aim of this study was to investigate which cast material is
superior for the management of these fractures. We undertook a single-centre
prospective randomised trial involving 199 patients with acute fractures
of the forearm requiring general anaesthesia for reduction. Patients
were randomised by sealed envelope into either a POP or synthetic
group and then underwent routine closed reduction and immobilisation
in a cast. The patients were reviewed at one and six weeks. A satisfaction
questionnaire was completed following the removal of the cast. All
clinical complications were recorded and the cast indices were calculated.
There was an increase in complications in the POP group. These complications
included soft areas of POP requiring revision and loss of reduction
with some requiring re-manipulation. There was an increased mean
padding index in the fractures that lost reduction. Synthetic casts
were preferred by the patients. This study indicates that the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction
are superior using synthetic casts with no reduction in safety. Cite this article:
