Histology is widely used for diagnosis of persistent infection during reimplantation in two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty, although data on its utility remain scarce. Therefore, this study aims to assess the predictive value of permanent sections at reimplantation in relation to reinfection risk, and to compare results of permanent and frozen sections. We retrospectively collected data from 226 patients (90 hips, 136 knees) with periprosthetic joint infection who underwent two-stage revision between August 2011 and September 2021, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Histology was assessed via the SLIM classification. First, we analyzed whether patients with positive permanent sections at reimplantation had higher reinfection rates than patients with negative histology. Further, we compared permanent and frozen section results, and assessed the influence of anatomical regions (knee versus hip), low- versus high-grade infections, as well as first revision versus multiple prior revisions on the histological result at reimplantation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated.Aims
Methods
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains
demanding due to limitations of all the available diagnostic tests.
The synovial fluid marker, α-defensin, is a promising adjunct for
the assessment of potential PJI. The purpose of this study was to
investigate the qualitative assessment of α-defensin, using Synovasure
to detect or exclude periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. We studied 50 patients (28 women, 22 men, mean age 65 years;
20 to 89) with a clinical indication for revision arthroplasty who
met the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study.
The presence of α-defensin was determined using the qualitative
Synovasure test and compared with standard diagnostic methods for
PJI. Based on modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS)
criteria, 13 cases were categorised as septic and 36 as aseptic revisions.
One test was inconclusive.Aims
Patients and Methods
