We assessed the age-related differences in the
use of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and outcomes, and associated
time-trends using the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample
(NIS) between 1998 and 2010. Age was categorised as <
50, 50
to 64, 65 to 79 and ≥ 80 years. Time-trends in the use of TSA were
compared using logistic regression or the Cochran Armitage test. The overall use of TSA increased from 2.96/100 000 in 1998 to
12.68/100 000 in 2010. Significantly lower rates were noted between
2009 and 2010, compared with between 1998 and 2000, for: mortality,
0.1% The rates of use of TSA/100 000 by age groups, <
50, 50 to
64, 65 to 79 and ≥ 80 years were: 0.32, 4.62, 17.82 and 12.56, respectively
in 1998 (p <
0.001); and 0.65, 17.49, 75.27 and 49.05, respectively
in 2010 (p <
0.001) with an increasing age-related difference
over time (p <
0.001). Across the age categories, there were
significant differences in the proportion: discharged to an inpatient
facility, 3.2% In a nationally representative sample, we noted a time-related
increase in the use of TSA and increasing age-related differences
in outcomes indicating a changing epidemiology of the use of TSA.
Age-related differences in outcomes suggest that attention should
focus on groups with the worst outcomes. Cite this article:
Our objective was to examine the rate of revision
and its predictive factors in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty
(TSA). We used prospectively collected data from the Mayo Clinic
Total Joint Registry to examine five-, ten- and 20-year revision-free
survival following TSA and the predictive factors. We examined patient
characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity), implant
fixation (cemented
Seligman’s theory of causal attribution predicts that patients with a pessimistic explanatory style will have less favourable health outcomes. We identified 702 patients who had undergone 894 primary total knee replacements between 1993 and 2005, who responded to follow-up surveys at two (n = 783 knee replacements) and/or five years (n = 443 knee replacements) and had also completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory long before the joint replacement (median = 16.6 and 14.5 years for two- and five-year cohorts, respectively). Scores from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Optimism-Pessimism scale were used to categorise patients as pessimistic (t-score >
60) or non-pessimistic (t-score ≤ 60). Multivariate logistic regression models assessing the effect of pessimistic explanatory style on pain or improvement in knee function were adjusted for gender, age, distance from the place of treatment and depression score. Pessimists reported (a) significantly more moderate or severe pain at two years with odds ratio 2.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 4.35; p = 0.02), but not at five years when the odds ratio was 1.21 (95% CI 0.51 to 2.83; p = 0.67); and (b) less improvement in knee function at two years when the odds ratio was 0.53 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.96; p = 0.04), but not at five years when the odds ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 0.57 to 2.77; p = 0.57). No significant associations with moderate or severe limitation of activity were seen at two or five years. We conclude that a pessimistic explanatory style is associated with worse pain and functional outcomes two years after total knee replacement.