We report a prospective cohort study of the midterm results of
surgical dislocation of the hip (according to Ganz) to perform resection
of osteochondromas involving the femoral neck in patients with multiple
hereditary exostoses (MHE). Hip range of movement (ROM) was assessed pre- and post-operatively.
Patients’ judgment of post-operative reduction of pain, symptoms,
the Rand 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) and complications were
analysed. Aims
Methods
In the absence of patellar resurfacing, we have
previously shown that the use of electrocautery around the margin of
the patella improved the one-year clinical outcome of total knee
replacement (TKR). In this prospective randomised study we compared
the mean 3.7 year (1.1 to 4.2) clinical outcomes of 300 TKRs performed
with and without electrocautery of the patellar rim: this is an
update of a previous report. The overall prevalence of anterior knee
pain was 32% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 26 to 39), and 26% (95%
CI 18 to 35) in the intervention group compared with 38% (95% CI
29 to 48) in the control group (chi-squared test; p = 0.06). The
overall prevalence of anterior knee pain remained unchanged between
the one-year and 3.7 year follow-up (chi-squared test; p = 0.12). The
mean total Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis
Indices and the American Knee Society knee and function scores at
3.7 years’ follow-up were similar in the intervention and control
groups (repeated measures analysis of variance p = 0.43, p = 0.09
and p = 0.59, respectively). There were no complications. A total
of ten patients (intervention group three, control group seven)
required secondary patellar resurfacing after the first year. Our study suggests that the improved clinical outcome with electrocautery
denervation compared with no electrocautery is not maintained at
a mean of 3.7 years’ follow-up. Cite this article:
The efficacy of circumpatellar electrocautery in reducing the incidence of post-operative anterior knee pain is unknown. We conducted a single-centre, outcome-assessor and patient-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial to compare circumpatellar electrocautery with no electrocautery in total knee replacement in the absence of patellar resurfacing. Patients requiring knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis were randomly assigned circumpatellar electrocautery (intervention group) or no electrocautery (control group). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of anterior knee pain. A secondary measure was the standardised clinical and patient-reported outcomes determined by the American Knee Society scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index. A total of 131 knees received circumpatellar electrocautery and 131 had no electrocautery. The overall incidence of anterior knee pain at follow-up at one year was 26% (20% to 31%), with 19% (12% to 26%) in the intervention group and 32% (24% to 40%) in the control group (p = 0.02). The relative risk reduction from electrocautery was 40% (9% to 61%) and the number needed to treat was 7.7 (4.3 to 41.4). The intervention group had a better mean total WOMAC score at follow-up at one year compared with the control group (16.3 (0 to 77.7) Our study suggests that in the absence of patellar resurfacing electrocautery around the margin of the patella improves the outcome of total knee replacement.
