The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation with locking-plate fixation for patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius in the five years after injury. We report the five-year follow-up of a multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 461 adults with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius within 3 cm of the radiocarpal joint that required surgical fixation were recruited from 18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Patients were excluded if the surface of the wrist joint was so badly displaced it required open reduction. In all, 448 patients were randomized to receive either K-wire fixation or locking-plate fixation. In the K-wire group, there were 179 female and 38 male patients with a mean age of 59.1 years (19 to 89). In the locking-plate group, there were 194 female and 37 male patients with a mean age of 58.3 years (20 to 89). The primary outcome measure was the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life using the EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) assessment, and further surgery related to the index fracture.Aims
Patients and Methods
We conducted a study to determine whether radiological parameters
correlate with patient reported functional outcome, health-related
quality of life and physical measures of function in patients with
a fracture of the distal radius. The post-operative palmar tilt and ulnar variance at six weeks
and 12 months were correlated with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation,
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and EuroQol scores,
grip strength, pinch strength and range of movement at three, six
and 12 months for 50 patients (mean age 57 years; 26 to 85) having surgical
fixation, with either percutaneous pinning or reconstruction with
a volar plate, for a fracture of the distal radius.Aims
Patients and Methods
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
We conducted an observational radiographic study
to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification
of fractures of the distal radius. Plain posteroanterior and lateral
radiographs of 456 patients with an acute fracture of the distal
radius were classified by a consultant orthopaedic hand specialist
and two specialist trainees, and the k coefficient for the inter-
and intra-observer reliability of the type, group and subgroup classification
was calculated. Only the type of fracture (A, B or C) was found to provide substantial
intra-observer reliability (k type 0.65). The inclusion
of ‘group’ and ‘subgroup’ into the classification reduced the inter-observer
reliability to fair (kgroup 0.29, ksubgroup =
0.28) and the intra-observer reliability to moderate (kgroup 0.53,
ksubgroup 0.49). Disagreement was found to arise between
specific subgroups, which may be amenable to clarification. Cite this article:
