The strain on clinic and surgeon resources resulting
from a rise in demand for total knee replacement (TKR) requires reconsideration
of when and how often patients need to be seen for follow-up. Surgeons
will otherwise require increased paramedical staff or need to limit
the number of TKRs they undertake. We reviewed the outcome data
of 16 414 primary TKRs undertaken at our centre to determine the
time to re-operation for any reason and for specific failure mechanisms.
Peak risk years for failure were determined by comparing the conditional
probability of failure, the number of failures divided by the total
number of TKRs cases, for each year. The median times to failure
for the most common failure mechanisms were 4.9 years (interquartile
range (IQR) 1.7 to 10.7) for femoral and tibial loosening, 1.9 years
(IQR 0.8 to 3.9) for infection, 3.1 years (IQR 1.6 to 5.5) for tibial
collapse and 5.6 years (IQR 3.4 to 9.3) for instability. The median
time to failure for all revisions was 3.3 years (IQR 1.2 to 8.5),
with an overall revision rate of 1.7% (n = 282). Results from our
patient population suggest that patients be seen for follow-up at
six months, one year, three years, eight years, 12 years, and every
five years thereafter. Patients with higher pain in the early post-operative
period or high body mass index (≥ 41 kg/m2) should be
monitored more closely. Cite this article:
Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis has increased in recent years with apparent improvement in the long-term results. This is a result of improved surgical technique, patient selection, and implant design. In an effort further to improve patient selection we analysed the relationship between the pre-operative alignment of the knee and the anatomical findings at the time of surgery. We compared these findings with the indications for UKA. From 4021 total knee arthroplasties we compared intra-operative observations with the pre-operative clinical data in order to identify knees with isolated, medial, compartment changes, which would have been ideal candidates for UKA. We found that only 247 of the knees (6.1%) met anatomical qualifications for isolated, medial, unicompartmental osteoarthritis, and of these, only 168 (4.3%) met clinical standards ideal for UKA. Pre-operative alignment showed a significant relationship with patterns of disease. Logistic regression revealed a relationship between pre-operative alignment and intra-operative findings resembling a Gaussian distribution. Patients with a pre-operative varus alignment of 7° were slightly more likely to be selected for UKA. But the further the anatomical alignment in either direction varies from 7° of varus, the more unlikely it is for the knee to exhibit a disease pattern of isolated, medial, unicompartmental osteoarthritis.
The postoperative analgesic effects of intra-articular injections of bupivacaine and/or morphine were examined prospectively in 437 patients who had total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. They were divided randomly into four groups. Group I received 10 mg of morphine (1 ml) and 9 ml of saline, group II received 10 ml of bupivacaine (2.5 mg/ml), group III received 10 ml of saline, and group IV received 10 mg of morphine (1 ml) and 9 ml of bupivacaine (2.5 mg/ml). All analgesics administered in the first 24 hours after operation were recorded. The patients rated their pain on the McGill-Melzack scale at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours. No significant differences were found between any of the groups in the use of Demoral and/or Toradol in 24 hours, the length of stay in hospital or the pain rating at 1, 6, 12 or 24 hours. Patients in groups I and IV, whose injections included morphine, used significantly more morphine in the first 24 postoperative hours than did groups II or III.
