Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is one of the most common soft-tissue tumours of the foot and ankle and can behave in a locally aggressive manner. Tumour control can be difficult, despite the various methods of treatment available. Since treatment guidelines are lacking, the aim of this study was to review the multidisciplinary management by presenting the largest series of TGCT of the foot and ankle to date from two specialized sarcoma centres. The Oxford Tumour Registry and the Leiden University Medical Centre Sarcoma Registry were retrospectively reviewed for patients with histologically proven foot and ankle TGCT diagnosed between January 2002 and August 2019.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and joint function in tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) patients before and after surgical treatment. This prospective cohort study run in two Dutch referral centres assessed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)) in 359 consecutive patients with localized- and diffuse-type TGCT of large joints. Patients with recurrent disease (n = 121) and a wait-and-see policy (n = 32) were excluded. Collected data were analyzed at specified time intervals preoperatively (baseline) and/or postoperatively up to five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with
a diffuse-type giant-cell tumour (Dt-GCT) (previously known as pigmented
villonodular synovitis) around the knee in order to assess the influence
of the type of surgery on the functional outcome and quality of
life (QOL). Between 1980 and 2001, 15 of these tumours had been
treated primarily at our tertiary referral centre and 15 had been
referred from elsewhere with recurrent lesions. The mean follow-up was 64 months (24 to 393). Functional outcome
and QOL were assessed with range of movement and the Knee injury
and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Musculoskeletal Tumour
Society (MSTS) score, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS)
and the SF-36 questionnaire. There was recurrence in four of 14
patients treated initially by open synovectomy. Local control was
achieved after a second operation in 13 of 14 (93%). Recurrence
occurred in 15 of 16 patients treated initially by arthroscopic
synovectomy. These patients underwent a mean of 1.8 arthroscopies
(one to eight) before open synovectomy. This achieved local control
in 8 of 15 (53%) after the first synovectomy and in 12 of 15 (80%)
after two. The functional outcome and QOL of patients who had undergone
primary arthroscopic synovectomy and its attendant subsequent surgical
procedures were compared with those who had had a primary open synovectomy
using the following measures: range of movement (114º Those who had undergone open synovectomy needed fewer subsequent
operations. Most patients who had been referred with a recurrence
had undergone an initial arthroscopic synovectomy followed by multiple
further synovectomies. At the final follow-up of eight years (2
to 32), these patients had impaired function and QOL compared with
those who had undergone open synovectomy initially. We conclude that the natural history of Dt-GCT in patients who
are treated by arthroscopic synovectomy has an unfavourable outcome,
and that primary open synovectomy should be undertaken to prevent
recurrence or residual disease. Cite this article:
