There is a lack of published evidence relating to the rate of nonunion seen in occult scaphoid fractures, diagnosed only after MRI. This study reports the rate of delayed union and nonunion in a cohort of patients with MRI-detected acute scaphoid fractures. This multicentre cohort study at eight centres in the UK included all patients with an acute scaphoid fracture diagnosed on MRI having presented acutely following wrist trauma with normal radiographs. Data were gathered retrospectively for a minimum of 12 months at each centre. The primary outcome measures were the rate of acute surgery, delayed union, and nonunion.Aims
Methods
It has previously been suggested that among unstable
ankle fractures, the presence of a malleolar fracture is associated
with a worse outcome than a corresponding ligamentous injury. However,
previous studies have included heterogeneous groups of injury. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether any specific pattern of
bony and/or ligamentous injury among a series of supination-external
rotation type IV (SER IV) ankle fractures treated with anatomical
fixation was associated with a worse outcome. We analysed a prospective cohort of 108 SER IV ankle fractures
with a follow-up of one year. Pre-operative radiographs and MRIs
were undertaken to characterise precisely the pattern of injury.
Operative treatment included fixation of all malleolar fractures.
Post-operative CT was used to assess reduction. The primary and
secondary outcome measures were the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
(FAOS) and the range of movement of the ankle. There were no clinically relevant differences between the four
possible SER IV fracture pattern groups with regard to the FAOS
or range of movement. In this population of strictly defined SER
IV ankle injuries, the presence of a malleolar fracture was not
associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome than its
ligamentous injury counterpart. Other factors inherent to the injury
and treatment may play a more important role in predicting outcome.
We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study. Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.